Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A QUASHED CONVICTION.

APPLICATION FOR REHEARING. At the Supremo Court on Saturday morn, | |p ing, before Mr. Justice Conolly, an applica- , | tion was made by Mr. J. R. Reed for a rule absolute for a writ of habeas corpus, iu re- " - \a spect of Charles Reid, against whom a conviction of six months' imprisonment, recorded by Messrs. R. F. Webster and John Cauless, •v < JiP.'s, was quashed, by His-Honor at a .• • sitting in banco held 011 Friday last, on the ; v. grounds that the conviction was bad at law, and that the justices had 110 jurisdiction in ! the case. I Mr. Tole said he appeared for the informant, and had been placed in an anomalous ;' position. He had been . instructed to appear for. the informant, but had not received any intimation of the.date on which the ap- ; plication was to .be heard.';' The motion ■ ~ paper stated that it would be heard 011 the 't 22nd iust., but that day was a Court holi- ; day, and he had received 110 further notice of the hearing.:- The first lie knew of the case was ; through, reading .the report of. the proceedings in the daily papers. -'0 ; . . : Vv ' V: His Honor pointed out that.- the informant had received notice of the date of hearing.. ■; Mr. Tole said neither ; the inspector of police nor himself had received the notice. The decision of the - Court on . the question was an important matter," and affected the : ' whole course of justice. It depended on His Honor whether the. conviction were irrevocably quashed, or whether argument I 'could ' ' be heard on the other side. He ; had been ■ instructed to appear, but had not beeu notified that the case was to be taken on Fri- . day. • ■ - * ■' , _ . His Honor said the case ■ must be reargued, as Mr. .Tole had received no intimation of the hearing. Mr. Reed considered that the omission was one of pure negligence. ' The notice of ■' motion to quash the conviction on the 22nd . inst., had been duly sent ; on the 17th inst. Another note had been forwarded on Saturday last, and would be received on the fol- ' $»} lowing; Monday evening. He objected, to : ' the. case being reopened. • . - His Honor said he must order the case to be reargued, and fixed Tuesday next-, at ten a.m., for the purpose. -.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19020127.2.10

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIX, Issue 11873, 27 January 1902, Page 3

Word Count
382

A QUASHED CONVICTION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIX, Issue 11873, 27 January 1902, Page 3

A QUASHED CONVICTION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIX, Issue 11873, 27 January 1902, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert