Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUDGE BACKHOUSE ON ARBITRATION.

The report presented by Judge Backhouse to the New South Wales Assembly will not be unanimously accepted here as an altogether correct representation of the effects produced by our Conciliation and Arbitration Act. Many will take exception to the statement that the law has tended: to a more harmonious feeling among the people gener-

ally, for we have had of late certain rulings and awards which are bit- ' terly resented and the ever-increae. ing volume of business coining before both courts and " boards ; shows that -a deep feeling o f ,. unrest is being excited. As-' Judge Backhouse very shrewdly ' goes on to remark, " the awards'.' generally have been in favour of the ■ workers," and he earlier states that "the effect oi the Act has been ud< doubtediy to make the public paymore for the products of industries which have been regulated by thg Board or Court." This, h= says, happens when tariff or other con. ditions bar foreign competition. What happens when there is no op- I portunity for the employer to com. pensate himself at the expense of; the consumer he does not say, but a decreasing output and an in, creased importation is the obvious '• effect. It should be (noted, how* evei, that the summing-up of his in t ' vestigations is a distinct and inv J j qualified confirmation of the position iterated and reiterated in the New* Zealand Herald. Not until the* lean years come can compulsory arbitration be regarded as tested and proved. He points out, as we have | repeatedly pointed out, that indus- - trial activity has affected wage/: conditions here as everywhere else, and that om prosperity is not dug to our labour laws, but that the seeming triumph or our labour lawjj may easily be temporary and due toT a temporary industrial activity, <■" This opinion can hardly be regarded as an unqualified approval of an Act which he asserts to encourage "harmonious feeling." It rather indi<cates that his judicial mind, how- - ever it may be wrongly impressed by. other people's opinions, is totally dissatisfied with its impressions and insists upon waiting for the unmistakable verdict of time. When world is slack, when values are falling, - when men are idling and employers putting up their shutters, we shall? see whether arbitration is workable) or not. ' That is in reality JudgeBackhouse's decision. ri Jpi

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19010726.2.21

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11716, 26 July 1901, Page 4

Word Count
392

JUDGE BACKHOUSE ON ARBITRATION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11716, 26 July 1901, Page 4

JUDGE BACKHOUSE ON ARBITRATION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11716, 26 July 1901, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert