Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHERE ALARM-BOXES ARE UNRELIABLE.

; TO THE, EDITOR. "aSir,—Your correspondent, F. Castle, may be endowed with the inventive faculty, but it is rather trying to one's patience- to be called on to reply to such densencss as your correspondent exhibits in his letter of the 15th inst. F. Castle asserts that I have

... not brought forward a single argument that will | hold water against the immediate establishment of a complete system" (firealarms is the system referred to). 116 then proceeds on the lines that I am opposed to the fire-alarm system. I will repeat a sentence of my letter of the Bth inst., which I thought was clear enough to show my meaning: "Fire-alarms require some pa.-non to operate on them, and when a fire fis discovered near art alarm-box the system is excellent." And then I proceed to point out that in some unfrequented parts of fie city during the night, alarm-boxes in such localities would not be :so reliable as a man doing duty in a watch-tower, as v he would probably discover a dense column of smoke bo- . fore the actual outbreak. Take another of our friend's statements: "Forewarned" thinks that alarm-boxes may save a little time; there is no uncertainty about it they do save time. Now supposing "F. Castle" was in Smith and Caughey's (one of the ' houses he mentions) where there are two telephones, would he save t-imo by making his way out of. this place to run 110 yds clown the street to "break a glass" in an ■ alarm-box ? If "F. Oastle" is the gentle--1 man who is' associated with Mr. McDermott in a fire-alarm invention, which appears to meet what I desire, the action of. the fire ; sets off the alarm, then this city may be spared the risk of death and disaster in the future, and I heartily wish the inventors ? every success. Having had twice "13 years' . experience in these matters," allow mo once more to point out the unreliability of "fire- ' alarms," unless self acting, in unfrequented ' localities during the night, but at the same '' time keep a tell-tale on the watchman.—l ' am, etc., Forewarned. 1 Ponsonby, July 15, 1901.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19010722.2.79.11

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11711, 22 July 1901, Page 7

Word Count
360

WHERE ALARM-BOXES ARE UNRELIABLE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11711, 22 July 1901, Page 7

WHERE ALARM-BOXES ARE UNRELIABLE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 11711, 22 July 1901, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert