DISPUTE IN TEE BOO TTRADE.

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXV, Issue 10900, 3 November 1898, Page 5

DISPUTE IN TEE 800 TTRADE.

TnE mediation of the Conciliation Board is once more required in a local trade dispute. This time it is the bootmakers who have differences with their masters. Mr. R. G. Thomas, the clerk of awards, yesteTday received notice of the matter. The document filed stated that the dispute was between the Auckland Operative Bootmakers Industrial Union and the masters, 30 of the latter being cited. In Septemboi', 1898, an industrial dispute between the New Zealand Federated Boot Trade Association of Workmen (ot which the Auckland union is a branch), and the New Zealand Boot Manufacturers Industrial Union of Employers was heard by fte i Court of Arbitration, and award was made. ' The Auckland masters were not included in the award, and the men now ask to have them brought under its provisions lhe masters cited are: A. G. Broofo,, L. Br«icrens 6. A. Coles, Buckland and Co., Cooperative Boot Manufacturing Co H Davy, Cck and Co., Felton Bros, J. Graham, Hebden and Dymock, W. Hoskms, A. Huehes, Johnston Bros., G. Jones and bon, Murray and McGinley, Norton Boot Co., T Prosser, Parker,. Green, and Co., A. Rhodes, Sehofield and Son, J. T™with, Walton and Sons, B. Crocker, A. Walker, WmHoldsworth;.R. White, Chas. Sexton, a Foster, P. Blampid, J. Stevens. Mr. Thomas has convened the meeting for November 10 at ten a.m. The Board meets in the Supreme Court Buildings.