Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW AND POLICE.

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Thursdat. (Before Mr. If. W. Nortbcroft. S.M.I TJndkfksdkd CASES.-In the undermentioned cases His Worship enteied judgment for plaintiff with costs:— T. Garlick and Co. (.Mr. Gittos) v. A. F. Smith, claim £1 7s lOd. costs 16s: W. S. Jones v. U. W. P. Seon, claim £6 15s 6(1, costs 15s; W. J. (Jooke (Mr. Button) .v. C. Robson, claim £1 4s (judgment for 14?), costs 6a; J. Rett (Mr. Beale) v. J. Barrett, claim£6s l2a lid. costs £4 17s 6d; Wingate aud Co. v. A. May, claim £30* 9d, costs6s; F. J. Bennett (Mr. Gittos) v. (}. Wills, claim £2, costs lis; Cooke and Cooke (Mr. Gittos) v. R. Carr, claim £4 8s 6(1 (judgment for £3 18s 6(1), costs las; Ireland Brothers (Mr. Burton) v. J. Carroll, claim £2 Is s<l, Co3ts lis 4, L. Donald (Mr. Dunne) v. F. Leahy, claim £2 Os 3d. costs lis: A. Atkinson (Mr. Beale) v. H. R. Moore, claim £1 193 4d, costs 6s; J. Jackson (Mr. Blades) v. J. Beriro, claim £29 17s 2d, costs £3 is; R. T. Reid (Mr. Mc7eagli) v. R. Eaton, claim £112s 6(1. costs 6s. A. J. Rntrican and Co. v. G. YOUNG.Cluim £5 19s 3d, for goods supplied. Mr. McGrc/'ii■ appeared .for the plaintiffs. Defendant'* evidence was taken at Opoliki, where li« resides. Messrs. Entrican, R. J. Ejiuicm, mid C. Arthur were examined for the plaintiffs. Judgment was entered for the full amount claimed, with costs." T. FauIjDKB v. C. Kiso.-Claim, £1 12s, as sent, of a wttage., Judgment was given for plaintiff, with 6s costs. "■■.'•' J. Hand v. G. R. Plaintiff, the licensee of the Thames Hotel..claimed £4 15.8 from defendant for board and lodging. Judgment, was given for the amount claimed, for £4 15s. with costs 6s.- ' ■'•> " : -si Ckcil Holmes v. Mr. Plaintiff; an artist, claimed from defendant, a. boardpig-. housekeeper, at Hamilton, the return of a sample portrait, or its value, '£4''los; It appears that the picture was left at .'Mr. Hill's by one of plaintiffs travellers. Defendant said he did not like to deliver up the picture without an .order from the traveller. His Worship ordered defendant to give up the property, or pay its value.. ,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18961218.2.53

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10318, 18 December 1896, Page 6

Word Count
368

LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10318, 18 December 1896, Page 6

LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10318, 18 December 1896, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert