User accounts and text correction are temporarily unavailable due to site maintenance.
×
Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NOMINATIONS A SERIOUS BLUNDER.

If i vrill ddubtieus: cms 3 iconisidaralble sensation rtofc day in ltliiid district be t ffirraikgilitlufc the ictnldn? roileainitllai jit ilsas; foeen ] discovered ithnfc a iserimis jhlunnler ban [been icmnitiittedi geniibkl y: ' in! fixing it! ' date ifcr it he final ;recei])t Ibi! 1 nominations; : of niididat?s 1 for i to-day. 'The ! taut Unit tine 27ith hao been adrertiseel i in a tine electorates as ithe iiaetto which :noniirtji±ion 3 ;c6u ld> be rented ishowal that itlne enrdr has arisen froilj a Common ceiut/-e-, and thai itle t-exufcinpr officers are not: in anyi my ibtitltaei fact = is [apparent that* jfesieafoji was! tlim latest date at Trhi(il): ■morajiiations for I th j coining iPs.rliafiljntary > elections coiilc .be pkcled ii itlip 1 hands of: the returning officers, laad itlcai Ajiiy nominations after chat date njiiist ibei invalid.] The iworijngkltliaiiitioli til 3 Bijbiftdfciis in [the stlii «fctii)ij' which rehds ■: --"Ajny mui qilaMed inise,ctioin9cf itliis Act, viifch iiu consent,! may ibn nomimated, as la,candidate fon election 1 for any I cisihrtici- jby mot ilessi than itvro 3ltcto:'s:ol' tleilast-natned'district, by a ncniinaticn.jimeiyin the torn) or tol the [effect i siiti rath in tiid 12.hi schedule hereto, igtvn( or 1 trainsmlitced ; tj Ithe return i ngl soiasi tD retch him ant talis ithan seym days Ir'efore itlie Klfiy] appointed: for it! e: iboll.' ! iTirning to the 1 best -rccffifiisftd .aitiiolrityi cnltbe intarprfttfiiloMcf Jpaal terms—namely, Stroud'?. "iJliciilUt Dictiioaa ryiwh fii d itliaf: H where tjitie is: t(b 'ore computed US rrtolc less'ltliasna, given numberiof days itltal; .mean* clmr days."' 'iTiirniiig' to itle,same :aihtho'ity:fori tliei interpret,aition of V clear (ivy : v wei tin i that 'fthe Ipliirass'clpfl.r Itlnya' niipamd t,ialt this time is:to bfiJi'Gekointl chime lot hath! the (first find ilastldsy'j." rUndek* this: inter ipi'etaiigih wiiiaiifi itlie. authoritative oye; the day of ;teationi and it lie dr.ylol: [nomination! <lo:lot:count, and jbetweien itiiieiu it!r"re must intervei:e [ s«vert clear :days,:sffl tliatt bi«; ekotion ,:layi heint; !ti:<ed (by Statute foil Mictaj? next the ;4thi of I December, itli.ei latest day 1 permissible lon receiving nominations wan syfestecduj, 1 Met as strengthening! this :e»ncliisio:i,[ for :it is mcliapn table, ib at ias i llhsttitjfnj . it ■we nijay uremtron ! th*.fc< ufci the : list ; general lelecttlDi:-—villi 1.8931—th« isevenlclief.ndaya > 1 were Dbs&rred, the litestidate loir nouiiinattoasi in the oily itlueh being it Ire fiQtli, lahct tliu jdatu 0?; election the! £81 In of llvo^ehiiber. 1 iThwt uny intending ciiiidiidates sJiduldiha'e been 1 imsled in this ' '\vjay i|R 'gnea.tly tc: lifiiregrei;twl. and th 3 jfulfc Extent of itiie mischief! atone ii'l . io;ilV ibocotne ]app'iire::iti' wl en iwb ilemra 1 exactly wl 01 ha ; ei and wild bmvo net 1 been 1 nDmiaated ithnpuglcoutl tliei colon i 'withinitieistateory time, 'The error, 1 ia* ' we: have i&.lid, [appears ito shave igenekHj extended itlirqughont itlie : colony,iahdi ro.dt>u.bHil> luveicapsieed i a:good mane/ 3ailciilattonsitllat havesbeen 1 raadei, but. '-/liat political party may: have I lost. 'Oil Raided (by the: luisadreitute we are not in a position -toisayiubtil itlie 1 lists ofithose who ha re been [nominated ■in ithe; several: districts, are copiplete. .Attention ilnsl beieri idirectlecl ito ithe 1 wholes subject.by the:action of the:reI 1 turning btiicer. in I tie' \7aiirarapaj vrho ! appears lo:lmvp gone to rtlie (extreme in the 1 otlreii direction: hip risiigtlie closing I !of nominations nt itco ;rly a date, and 51 refitting a; isuibqequant 1 nomination 31 paper'which (appeani ito iliave 1 been . 1 presented i;oilnnv within,statutory. timß, fills I having 1 been 1 i'ctern;d ito itlie CDoioaial Secretary, the/ wliole intaiter I I Of itlie Ibiuhcer wvsrl the nomination of 1: candidates; in forded forward' for con1, sideratioii. 'lliern will nci ddubt: be 3 ia isearchingi inquiry I demanded i tn.o g tJie conduct^of I those wlioi may 1 have ■ been; responsible fon an, apparent BiisI I cireatiui* to klife iiatt rnitig! Officers, and 5 it is ito he hoped:, for, thi Mnour ofitlie b 1 color,yl tilin.t it? iill inoti be :fouhd that , there was any pclliiidial or 1 party qb;e(it r . at it lie 1 bottom] of; it, IThix, sf: course, , 1 v'ill bel tliei first thought that Kv 11 asriiso " I i i 1 tliei mimisi of : disappointed: cahdi- : I dates who may liasvd been oleprivlec of t Ihein opportunity for 1 receidpg itl 0 3 siuffnigeslof their supporter.'!. A|t prer sent, the! inciiien# ksmotl this: com- , 1 flexion, 1 bun whatieveri or; whosotev 3r ' I may 1 have, bead the jcaiue: of lit, the 3 1 accuFr#n:ei ::si one itlla; irefltoiis l very > i little icrediii :on those who 1 have 3 1 had the oversight of thai .TrirapgieriKtnts. ; What intakes Ithe position (worse is j. tiis.t I tiierei is 110 pcss9ilii'i r ivjT of :ricl,ify--1 ifig: the: erroi. ; Tlib floturinjig Officer is ] precluded in: term# cf itlie, fro in 1 re- " 1 ceiivipg anyifiirlthan liominfttionsi infter • the 26tlv and any eleation 1 eld 011 the 11 basis ofi such ai nomination wiodld he 51 neeessirrlji invalid..: JProvi&toh isimade , iti the Autsasi to it lie icqufso to <b 5 itaken in:raiaiiig; objection 1 to 1 noiniinatiions, suoh' Qbjec<tiDi:s > bieiju; required ltd bo f plftccdi in itl ei hands :ol the sreturning I 1 officer not less itlia ifive daysl ibefoi'6 ; 1 fchd da :e:ofl the pollipgl day 1 that is to ' I say, to:-morro\f, Saturday; ist the .latest cui.V lor objecting. But iniview ofltbe 1: preciißion of the kwioft ths iiubji:ect,:the • fcutiility of [nominations lifter this statu--3; tory date Hvill probably ibe reuojjmsjd 0 : by: the; unfortunate ito Purlia- . i mdntaryi hoiiomn,Kvliol tmoilgn 1:1 a fault i i tlieir 1 own are excluded from It lit ' 1 sUction,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18961127.2.17

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10300, 27 November 1896, Page 4

Word Count
931

THE NOMINATIONS A SERIOUS BLUNDER. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10300, 27 November 1896, Page 4

THE NOMINATIONS A SERIOUS BLUNDER. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10300, 27 November 1896, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert