LAW AND POLICE.
POLICE COURT, QPUNAKE (TARANAKI). Friday, December 27. [Before Messrs. 0. W. (Jane, ami S. A. Breach, J.P.'s] Police v. Charges Goosey. - Defendant was summoned to show cause why a prohibition order should not he granted against him. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Constable Twoiney Rave evidence. Defendant, in giving evidence, stated that it would cause his death if he was suddenly deprived of intoxicating liquor, and that he could produce a doctor's certificate to that effect. As ho got his living about hotels, it would provent him earning; a living. He would not be able to spend his evenings in the bil-liard-room. He required a good number of drinks every day, or ho would be a dead man. Ho was not a noisy man when drunk. The Court adjourned the. case until next Court day, the "24th January, 1896, defendant to procure a doctor's certificate, the police at the same time to report on defendant's habits during the meantime. Prohibition Orderßenewed.—A renewal of a prohibition order was granted against Rakahukura for 12 months, such order to apply to Opunake, Rahotu, and the Geo Hotcls.-fOwn Correspondent.}
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18960103.2.10
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10018, 3 January 1896, Page 3
Word Count
187LAW AND POLICE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXXIII, Issue 10018, 3 January 1896, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in