Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE QUEEN V. HON. J. B. WHYTE.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir,—On my returning to Auckland yesterday from a visit to my native country, Scotland, I was much surprised to find that my _ name had been publicly mentioned during my absence, in what I think was a most unwarrantable manner, in connection with the prosecution for conspirary, instituted by the Audit- Department against the Hon. J. B. Whyte, M.L.C. I may say at once that I do not know Mr. Whyte, and have never to my knowledge seen him, nor have I ever had any communication with him direct or indirect during the whole course of my life. It has been asserted that I was spirited out of the country in order that I might not be called as a witness for the Crown in the case against Mr. Whyte. This statement is perfectly unfounded. I left for Scotland, in no way hurriedly, upon family business. It was well-known to my friends for some time previous to my departure, that I was contemplating a visit to the Old Country, and the suggestion of being "spirited away" is as ludicrous as it is untrue. It has also been said that I refused, after receiving a subpoana, to come on shore from the s.s. Tainui, the ship by which I left Wellington for England. The fact is when I received the subpoena from the hands of a constable, who came in a steam-tender, I was on the high seas, and the constable retired precipitately from the Tainui, fearing to be carried too far from the Coast. I showed the subpoena to the authorities of the ship, and was informed it was impossible for me to be put back. Had the Crown wished me to attend as a witness in the case, very slight enquiry would have enabled them to ascertain the date of my departure, and my evidence could have been taken before I left the colony. I am now here, and shall be glad to give such evidence as I can upon the subject of my land transactions with the Government if the authorities so desire.—l am, etc., Archibald Grandison, Parliament-street, August 3,1892.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18920804.2.11.2

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIX, Issue 8948, 4 August 1892, Page 3

Word Count
361

THE QUEEN V. HON. J. B. WHYTE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIX, Issue 8948, 4 August 1892, Page 3

THE QUEEN V. HON. J. B. WHYTE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIX, Issue 8948, 4 August 1892, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert