WELLINGTON APPEAL COURT
[BY TELEGRAPH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION'.] Wellington, Tuesday. . Is the Appeal Court the case of the inhabitants of the Clivo Board district (appellants) v. Guy (respondent), an appeal from a decision of Mr. Justice Conolly, was argued. The principal question at issue is whether in stopping a road the decision of the County Council as to what gives pro-perty-holders "as convenient • access " .as before, is final, or whether it can be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Mr. justice Conolly held that the Court had power to .review the Council's decision, and it is to shis ruling that the Road Board now dis•ents. Judgment was reserved. Argument jvas commenced in the case of Ryland and sons (appellants) v. the Official Assignee at Vapier (respondent), an appeal from a ■udgment of Mr. Justice Conolly. His Honor held that the pay merit to tho Sheriff upon an execution levied upon the property of J. G. Kinross within three months of his bankruptcy amounted to a fraudulent preference.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18901105.2.22
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXVII, Issue 8405, 5 November 1890, Page 5
Word Count
165WELLINGTON APPEAL COURT New Zealand Herald, Volume XXVII, Issue 8405, 5 November 1890, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in