Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE RESERVOIR RUIN.

TO THK KDITOBv Sir,—T will, if you please, give yott my idea of this disaster and its remedy. First, I must say I know nothing of the planners or constructors, nor yet of the way in which the work has been done; in fact, I did not know the thing was in existence, till I saw the account of its failure Iα the HbEald, By appearance, then—for I have been several times to look at it—it is evidunt the cause is the bottom end of the work was not mad* as aelid aa the top. Some may say any fool could tell that. Perhaps so, bat it is neoee! sary to keep this in mind, for if the embank* ment is to be made safe that i* what must yet be done. There is no mystery in the case. Plainly enough, it is the natural settling pf loose earth, which, it appears, moat have been tipped down, so forming a series of slanting strata (or mainly bo done), and the wall has been depended upon to hold it back. But a wall fit for such a purpose ought to have the base nearly equal to the height, and I see, by the plan in the Hebald, the base is only one-quarter of the height. Now a slanting strata causes a much greater lateral pressure than a horizontal one, and that pressure, as against this wall, is, as four times multiplied, being applied, as, it were, at the end of a lever of four to one against the base', and the watertight stone wall, retaining the moisture, adds to this weight, . making the wall of ao use, except where it is held up by a sufficient backing of earth. This is self-evident, for where the backing is too elighb the wall has bulged considerably, bat where the wall is well supported by the earth the outthrust is not perceptible. What, then, is the use of a stone wall for an embankment? just so much (and that only) that stone ie heavier than solid earth; 200 yards of solid earth would (for this purpose) give more support than 200 yards of stone, and'a mortar-built wall In this plaoe is positive waute of money, For repairing they should commence at the bottom, and throw the present bank down in steps, spreading it oat in continual horizontal strata, well ramming each step solid, alwaya keeping the floors horizontal its they go on till it is raised to the proper height. The earth should be spread regularly six or eight inches thick, or lets, and rammed solid before the next layer is spread on. Of course, the wall stones need using up, and they might be built in anywhere convenient to get rid of them. They should be built without mortar, bat the interstices of each course filled in with earth. If some each plan as this is adopted, it will last for ever. There is no necessity to reduce the capaoity of the reservoir, for if properly done it would be aa solid as the top.—l am, &c,, Mechanic.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18861218.2.11.3

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIII, Issue 7824, 18 December 1886, Page 3

Word Count
518

THE RESERVOIR RUIN. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIII, Issue 7824, 18 December 1886, Page 3

THE RESERVOIR RUIN. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIII, Issue 7824, 18 December 1886, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert