RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Friday.
[Before Thomas lieckliam, Ksq., U.M.] The ordinary weekly sitting of this Court was held this morning, and the following business disposed of :— Undefended Cases for I'i.aintu'k).—J. B. Francis v. H. Wright, claim £5 13s (goods); McLaughlin v. Dawson, £14 18s (goods) ; R. Elley v. J. Breen, £8 Os lid (goods). The Luxury of Law (Coktello v. Woehall).—The claim in this casettfF-gjset down at £1 10s, but in strictness the difference between the parties was only us. Judgment was given for plaintiff upon' the evidence, which was wholly in his.fayour, but the expense imposed upon the plaintiff! by the result of the decision was £2 3s 6d, or nearly nine timds the amount of the sum due. The ia.cis were as follow :—The plaintiff had an •aero of green oats to sell, and the defendant' agreed .to buy them. Tba" plaintiff swore that tlie price agreed upon was at the rate of
£5 an acre for what the defendant would take. He only sold at that price, green food of the kind Belling at £6 and £7 the acre in Epsom, because he wanted the ground to put in a different crop. The defendant, however, said that the price was to have been at the rate of £4 10s. Nine chain and a-half of the crop were cut and carted away by the defendant. The defendant paid £3 15s into Court as the amount due from him to the plaintiff, in addition to 10s he had previously advanced on account. This reduced the' claim to the amount already stated. The defendant announced his intention of bringing a cross-action for a breach of contract, seeing that Costello had ploughed in some of the remainder of the acre, but Costello said the stuff was to have been carted away within three weeks or a month at the outside. It was more than five weeks before Worrall took the crop off. His Worship thought that if any one broke the contract it was the defendant himself, seeing that time was the essence of it. Judgment for plaintiff with costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18740829.2.20
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XI, Issue 3993, 29 August 1874, Page 3
Word Count
349RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Friday. New Zealand Herald, Volume XI, Issue 3993, 29 August 1874, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.