CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.

New Zealand Herald, Volume II, Issue 551, 18 August 1865, Page 5

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.

Thk usual monthly murting* of tho members of tho Chamber of Cointnoivo was hold at their rooms, <\): , hi'.in M V. Buildings, Fort-strect. J. A. Oillilhm, Fsq , pivsidii.g. Tho Secui-tam ro d the minutes of tho last mooting, which wen 1 -•.•nlinr.od. Mr. H. AT. J ivi-i. who was nominated a member at the last- un i'iinLC, was b.dlotted for, and elected a member unanimously. It was imumtuo d that the report of the Chamber upon tho operdinns "f tho " Debtors* and Creditors' Act" had been sent down bv t:.e first steamer after it hud been received, and was by this time, in all probability, now in tho hands of tho Government. A v*to of thanks was passed to Mr. Thomas Mnefarlnne. It transphvd. in th-- course of conversation, thatllie ('omjnis*io7ier »>f Customs had annonnocd his mtention of r-'vi tin- tariff, but what direction such revision would t tk" is not known. Mr. Svi>Ni:% JJii.l: Mr Chairman, there is one matter which I w..uM heic to bmg under the notice of the of llie Ch'iinher, aud which atl'ects the hon-T and the credit of tho mercantile eommuniiv living in this "Province. bin may have noticed in yt-stcrday'r* issue of the Xrir '/c.Utw'-a n-ni vk-ibie statement with regard to a well known linn in .lio'Mau'.i In that Ptatemetit it is st itcd th it in ihe latter part of l'vt-i tl.'at this firm supplied a (piniiitv o: 1 uildint; material to the natives, such as wnVhlc I sa-hes, and tl;a) these were not supplied or the legit iniate purpose lor which such articles are mamifaetup'd, hut as they contained a portion of lead, for the purpose of being m de into bullets In the rebels. It is » so stated that this firm was in the habit of sapplying flour to the rebel natives in the Thames, who were at the t hue in arms against us. I have written to a member of that linn to i*ive some explanation of the charge, and requested his presence here to-day. T mav sav that 1, for one, do not believe it. Hut 1 am anxious—not merely as regards the character of the firm wh< se conduct is inculpated, but as affecting the honour of the whole of tho mercantile community — that a direct and point blank denial should be giwn t<» this libellous charge. I will therefore, with the permission of the Chairman, ask Mr. Combes to explain or to deny the statement to which I have alluded. Mr. Cumuks: I he onlv statement I can make on behalf of the firm to which I belong is to deny tho whole of that statement. It is entirely unfounded. Wo have been thirty years here, and we have never sold to the natives a pound of phot, or a pound of powder. Neither have we ever been engaged in any trade at all directly, nor have we ever been ag-ait, bur f'»r one man that was at all connected with the native trade. 1 wrote to the Xi w 1 yesterday, and 1 will show you tho answer 1 received. I The Si-XKr.TAHY read the following communication:— Auckland. August !»!. JS'V>. Sir.—ln i\-plv to vottr letfcr r..e I'ith ia«rattt, askinc ■ Mt—r< .Mitciu-ifniM selV.-rn. .•ui»li> : -.-rs the .V. ir Xcnhiml, r. ; to yon with the li.iine i.f their at Wellington. iili a vu'w 1" ulterior |iroceeuini:s ; — i I hrir t-> s:iv, «ni i• <-ii:111* »>!' .Mitchell and Sertl'rn, that : tlicv ilrcline to give up the nani" of I heir rorre-pondent. ami that thev anv re>i'oa.-il»iiitv ic.-uUing l'ruai such I n-tt.sal. I in iy, ))i!« evi r. point out ! n yon that, white we wi>h to o\tei. 1 evt'i-y e«-urte\V ami every e\p! 11i.t'i«ni in the I inntter. ymi -ire not ee.titlfl to a-k an fXp'aua:ii»n of .t matter that so i.ir as <'api:aa D.ddy i-«.-uiuvrae<!, can only he t'oked l»y iiim porsMiially. \ am, cte.. CHAfI. K. JJITCHEI.r.. "Walter C'onibe>, Kstp Mr. It is Tnit ]ioor courage to attack a man who h is been out of th » count rv t wo years. The ' ttA i;3f ax said that. M i\ Combes ha I by h i •Miiphatie detoal "f the in tho X'.)i /" \ /-z/aA/• tlone all t bat »';i« required of him. Any fur j thcr ■■>:: lunation wa* uip«eei-?>ary. I ;:m i:kh ; '1 be ih-ur. .Mr I'ii.MliiM We d nv tin whole of theso nccu- | Satiuns — everything .-taP-d in tln ai—that we have over supnlie { eiiiier pow.ler, bullet * rr flour. We ! have been in trade i'or t hirtyyea s, and have never been except to one nun that \v;p in any way connected with the coast trade. Mr. "Watson Jjain said that the denial of Mr. Comb-s was till that was required. '1 hero was no other question before the Chamber, and the proceedings terminated. RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, j (Before Thomas Beckham, Esq., R.M.) i DIirjfKKNNESS. I Several drunkards were fined 205., or committed to \ the usual term of imprisonment. I SlilUOrS CIIAJtGIi. 3lr. L. Robertson, Into proprietor of the Union Hotel, was brought before his Worship, upon the serious charge of obtaining fr<>m a person named MeCaul, £5, under false and fraudulent pretences Mr. Weston appeared for the prosecutor, and Mr. Bcveridge appeared for the defendant. When the case was called on, it was intimated to his Wor-hip that the complainant wished to withdraw the prosecution. Mr. lieckham : I do not think this right. It is not the mere mutter of a pr vate injury to tlie complainant that is involved, but a question of public justice. J do not think I would be justified in allowing this matter to end lore, l'ersons luiut not come here and lay information, and then, when the matter conies to wear a serious asp-ct and they are sen ible of a responsibility, be allowed to withdraw the inf «rmatiou Look now, what a serious matter it would be, supposing a man to be charged with an abominable ciime, und that an information were to be laid charging him with the commission of such an ojl'enee, and the accused were brought up here, was the person who laid the information to s>y that he would withdraw the informati n r 1 A very serious consideration as all'ectiug the administration of justice itself. I must not let this ease pass in this way. Mr. Beveridge: Sir, I appear on behalf of tho prisoner, and I am perfectly ready to answer the charge. I am quite in position to defend the prisoner. Will you admit him to bail? Mr. Beckham : Yes. Mr. Bcveridge: What amount r Mr. Beckham : Tn this case after what the learned counsel bus htated, though I was about to ask for ! largo sureties, I will take the prisoners own bo.id for his appearance. i Remanded. SMALL DEBTS AND CUSTODY. (Belore Thomas Beckham, Esq., R.M.) Tut-: weekly Court for the recovery of debts Mas hold e-terdav. There were no fewer than ninetytwo cases set down ior hearing. ilis Worship pronounced judgment in tho follow- 1 injj cases : — nu.vmi AND sov V. DEWIIUItsT. Hi- Worship said that in this. c;i«n tho original , claim had been for (id. This has reduced by £7 10s. 'Jd., having- .CI lis. Dd. The plaintiff should bo allowed mtcrcj-l at live per cent., I which would amount to I yd. .J imminent of the ! Court would pass therefore for .U-l 1 -*»s. ] WJiICrLKV V. MILLS. ! In this ca-e bis Worship g;ave iudgmont for £3 ! In the evidence of tho piaiutili', he ha i failed to show j any damage ; but as the u fondant hud . ff«re-l £\ ] thereby admitting a claim to that exf« nt, the C'otirt . was of opinion that judgment must pass for the I plaijitiff for £3, but without co.sts. Jl'lifiMENT FOK I'I.AINT! F l f S. j Webb v. Amelia Carey, claim, ,C 9 os. Gd ; .Stocks v. Thompson, l!).s. od.; li"rne v. it. dackson, £11 Gs. hi ; Oldham v. Taylor, £3 lis. od. ; Cunningham v ( hay. ■'•di-on, £ll(js.; llardington | v. Nicol, £7 ; estate of J'ennisv. ,t;S os. ; | Uiddatns v. Mowbray, _t;2U Us. ; Danzev v. McDonald, .£* |< 12s. (id. ; Cnnckshank v. iMaurico i\inuuird, .L"b* 15s. -Id.; id aroiimton v. Eo.x, .C-i; llardington v. Cole, £'J os. ; Li all v. McDonald, £0 18i Gd- j Berwin and Mendeh-on v. Cusack, £3 lUs. ; iMears y. Parnall and Swinburne, £ s 2() Messenger v. Mowbray, £3 IGs. dwd. j Boyd v. ll.utt»on, £6 10s.; Boyd v. Wright, £0 ; Morrill v. Carey. JI'DCMENTS CO>*rtSScU) Ol'. SETTLE I). Martin v. R. McDonald, £12 ; Lewis Brothers v. Walters, £5 S3. ; shove v. Foley, £0 14s. -id. j Shove

v - Bond, £I.'} Ib. 41.; Shove v. Stuart, lis. lOd. ; •Shove v. funis, £■> IS*, lid.; Assignee of Allen v. Mowhrny, 1- l'Js.; ISU-ru-s v. Trevarthen ; IJurra and He Hii-jch v. Jilueher, Id. ; Nolan v. Hold£1G los. : Williamson v. Jodlin, £3 9s. -id.; Hilton v. Buntinir, .C-3 6s. ; Kirkwood v. j\EcDonuld, -ClB 10s. ; l.ynds v 11 ml- on, £3l> 'Js. ; Thomas v. March, .fciO Ms • lioyd v. .Buckley, £7 65.; Marshall v. Thorpe, £9 Gs. Gd' XO.Y-SCITKH A-li XOX-AI'I'HAKANCE. •Tacobs v. Schmidt., ;CS ; Loahv and another v. Dempsey, £3 15s. ; Chapman v. Winters. I)E1-' KNlisn t'AUSKS. llefore the commenceuient of tho hearing of defended causi s, Mr. Wvnn brought under the notice of liis Worship the great inconvenience Buffered by suitors in that court, to the circumstance that were the case was a contested one, and its hearing protracted, suitors had to vait, and their counsel hid to appear for th. in from day to day. It ought to ho competent for the court to grant some additional tee in respect to these multiplied attendances. Sometimes the suitor had to wait perhaps tho whole of one day and part i f another. It made no difference whatever to soii,-rora, who of course would look to (heir clients for their expenses, but it might he in the interest, of sui!"r-. if that, where a solicitor attenlcfl more than one day, he should bo allowed nt p'.rleips the full eio;i-.j ; . y:l v a half feo, whatever that amount, h,?. The learned counsel added that the of the court had of late so aecuniulati-d, he th iue. it il his duty to submit this suggestion tor Irs Worships' consideration. -Mr Weston said he w.e prepared to endorse tho surest ion that had fali-.-n from -Mr. Wvnn as a very go id one. Hi-. Worship thouehl the proposition was a very reasonable one. and that the L'ouitwoul i be wrong in no! i ntei taininu it. i.oi.nsaoiioroH v. sexioh. Claim, 7s. Mr. lirooklieM appeared for tho plaintiff, and Mr. ■BeVi'i'iilge fir the defendant. 'J he delfjuiant paid £5 int.o Court. This was a ease involving legal issue which it is of some imp rtanco .should bo generally known. The plaintill is a general practitioner, residing in furnell. 1 lie iletemlaut resides at freeman's liay. The action was lor medical attendance and fees. i he. delcnee was—first, that the charges were excessive, and second, that the plaintill'was a physician and could not recover fees. A great, variety of det dls were elicited in cross-ex-amiim ion, but troni its general tenor we gather that a general practitioner may bo a. surgeon only, or a surgeon and physician, but he must, if a surgeon, have a license from the Apothecaries' llull. It was alleged that a surgeon, although he might also be a physician—being a Licentiate of tho College of Physician—did not, when called upon to attend persons, come within the nomenclature of physician, but within the category of general practitioners ; the I'hy.-ieian prr .se confining himself to mere consultations in respect lo pathological subjects. 11l tho present, case the illness which the plaintill'was called upon to attend was one of strangulated hernia, in which the skill of a surgeon indispensable. Hi- \\or.--hi., said that it xva-. perfectly clear that the plaintiff was, in any consi cration, entitled to a judgment, but whether for the full amount, of the claim was a matter upon which the Collii would take time hcioi'e giving judgment. uoi.oUs v. I(oi;e.<s. Mr. ,r. 11 usseli appeared lor the plaint ill'. air W; tin for the d, fendae.l. 'I !:e claim «as l"l:i Is lid. but Ihe contest was only about one item, n -meiv. a soil of clothes. Ihe c:r.-um.-t:inces under whi h this action was brought we-o somew' at. unusual. A gentleman ordi-rei a suit of clothes of a well known tailor in >hortland-st cct, and ord. red tle in to be placed to the debit oi anotle r g ntleman residii g at (Jtahuhu where he kc]is t e "('morion," and is the pronrift. r. which is next to Ik-iiuc the author of" Sam Mick " It turp.'-d up in cvi.leoec that the gentleman li id s aked 'one" s..it of clothe, on the " o!e grey ho*s." w'niie t'other put his on the' biy." It was as c-s riljcil by the lir-t i. tilled .'c iitleman, a dobt of honour, to win -h. like love, anything in the shape of a S'-j."ors is fa'al. The case, however, was not allow, d to upon the merits, but was slopped Mr. Wyiui s.i ' that tie- pi dntilV could not recover, lor it was merely an indirect mode taken to ivc 'Ver a wilder. Mr. Hogcrs could not be made responsible for what Mr. Foley had ordered unless he had I.ecu present. Mr. 1/ossL-niskie i xamined : I remember Mr. Foley coming to me t ■ order a suit, of clothes. That win in May. IN l '",. [The plaintiff here produced his hooks.] ( hi the 2Slh of May liicic is an entry debiting Mr. Foley with a suit. On the Ist of May there is an entry debiting Mr. Kogeis with the suit of clothes. It happenc'i in this wuy : In the latter end of April Mr. holey came to me and told me to make a suit of clothes and put them down to Mr. Hogors. (A laiiith.) 1 sent the c othes to Mr Foley, saying when I delivered them that I would ud; Mr. Kogera whether it was ouilc correct. 1 met Mr. Rogers in the street, and he told me, when I asked hirn about, it, that, it was quite correct, and he said also, " Well, if he did 1 will have to pay for it as I lost." Mr. k'oiev came up doling the conversation, aud consequently it changed tho entry in my book, taking it from Mr. Foley's account and putting it to Mr. Rogers'. Cross-examined t Mr. Foley, when he came to me, said that it was on account of a bet which Mr. lowers w.ts to have paid I would u:ivo Mr. Foley credit for a suit of clothe* as soon as Mr Rogers. I must get the money from one or the other (Laughter.) I do not know thvt there was a bet between thorn. Had Mr llogers not promised to pav I would still have held Mr. Foley liable. About a tort night after 1 met Mr. hogers. 1 hai o easion to bavu all act omits paid t > my solicitor. Subsequently mentioned the matter to Mr. Rogers, who said he knew nothing about the matter. Mr. 'anies Foley, examined : I have been subpiena'd here—one —by the dctemlant. At all events X have lost, two days ovr this business, (laughter.) I l-einember one Friday, in the Provincial (Jouncil Chamber, seeing Mr. l ogcra and another gentleman. AVe spoke about the races. Mr. Rogers said that lie had lost his bet. 1 went to l'osseniskie's and ordered the coat 3 had won tho bet, and told Fosseniskie to put it down to Rogers. I remember I went to Mr. Rogers on the Sunday following and dined there, and Mr. Rogers said the coat was too short. It- was a debt of honor aud 1 do not see what business it has here at all. (Laughter.) It was elicited that there was an assignment of the books oi' the plaintill' to Mr. Posseneskie, but proof wii, not adduced and the plaintiff was nonsuited. EEATTIB V. T.VELL. Claim iC-l.'i 1 is. 'Id. Mr. Urooktield appeared for the plaintiff. Mr. Bcveridge for tie" defendant. The circumstances of this case were very extraordinary. In IS'jj tli'i defendant kept a privato bank ill Detroit in Michigan. Plaintiff deposited 1000 dollars with him, for which he go; a icccipt from a clerk, in plaintiff's employment named rfcott. Iu 18 )S left with the defendant a noie tor 200 dollars. This hitler amount was the sum sued for. The turions part, of the ease was that the pertinacious suitor had followed tho defendant very nearly over liaif the world, proceeding to England, Scotland, and Jersey alter him, at last coming to Auckland. '.I he defence was that there was no proof that a person named Anderson, to whom the piaiotifl gave t he note. Was in the defendant's employment. Also that leeoverv was burred by the statute of limitations. llis Worship thought the plaintill had not made out liis ease, io the absence ut tho defendant the plaintiff was imn-uiie !. Tin- p'amtili's eounsel said he would take care to linvc Mr. .1 yell before the Court at the next sitting dayClttoOltTO>' AMI SC.-LES V. Bl."It>" AND A>"o'lliElt. Claim, .C'o His. 4-d. Mr. Urooliflel I and Mr. Wynn appeared for the pi iutill. Air. .r. 11. h'ussed lor -Ml'. Ruin. Weston anil Mr. .J. hussell lor ■ tlier defendants. '1 his was an action f i the recovery of the above sum account of advertisement*, onutiog, &e., for the Committee of the Regat'u of lafl-l-. The defence was a general dt nial. Thomas Ouildiug examined by Mr. Brookfield, saiil : i am rather fond of aquatic innu-ements. I was so at (lie time of the hi-gutta iu lS'id. Myself an Mr. Burn were members of that Committee. 3Jr. J. J5. Russell said Unit before the case proceeded the books containing the minute of the appointment of the Committee should be produced. Witness : There was a general minute book, but the C'oinmi'-t-e itself was constc. tly changing, one going i out aud another coming iu. I do not know that I gave

any special orders to the plaintiffs for printing tho programme. The representatives of the Sprees were in tlio room at the time tlie programme was made' out, and I think took it away with them. Two of'the ! documents in Court are signed by me. The signature is mine. I do not know whether thqyiu-ere Bent to the Southern Cross office. I do not know whether I t >ok them to the office. I think the representatives of the press took them away. Mr. J. B. Russell said that if any resolutions wore in the handwriting of the witness they must be produced, and then they would not be evidence as agninst Mr. Burn. "Witness : The books were made up of minutes and were copied from these in Court, which are original documents. Arrangement were afterwards made for the printing. I do not know that I gave any orders as to the printing. I will not ewear I did not. I went several times to make alterations in the advertisments. I saw these advertisments from time to time in the Southern Cross.l—l told—think it was Mr. Scales —that they ought to have been put in a shorter space. Mr. Weston thought that th« minutes of what took place should be produced. Mr. Wynn contended that where a number of persons met together for a particular purpose, ora testimony of one was the legitimate evidence of what took place, the minutes were of no value except in the a'osence of such testimony. Mr. J. B. Russell Baid that even according to the law, as stated then, it Bhould be shown that Mr. Burn was present. If certain resolutions was passed, was Mr. ? From the witness's own statement, he gave directions for particular alterations. If so, the document contaiuiug the alterations should be produced. Mr' Wynn said that this was an enquiry, not as to what passed at a particular place and time, but to fix liability of particular individuals. The Court suggested whether the only use of these ' resolutions, were for the wituess to refrosh his memory. Mr. Weston said the ease was one of joint liability. The books would show the liability, coupled with other testimony, oral or document, and if the parties concerned wished to separate the liability, and this kind of evidence would aid they no right to it ? The Court said that the contest was as yet premature. No doubt the resolutions would form a point in the case at a later stage, but their contents could not be stated, unless produced. Witness : Tlio?o documents which bear my signature were draughts for advertisements. They are in my handwriting. Mr. David Bum was present at nearly all these meetings. Cross-examined by Mr. J. B. Russell: My action in-this matter was pursuant to instructions from the committee, and under resolutions agreed upon by the committee. Mr. .T. B. Rusßell: Your Worship will perceive now the necessity of having the resolutions. Mr. Wynn said that Mr. Guilding went 'to the plaintiffs and said, publish certain documents. The instructions ho might receive from others did not in the least affect the plaintiffs' right to recover. It was nothing that certain other persons should have authorised him. Mr. Garlick : I am head clerk and manager of the advertising department of the Southern Cross. I was so in ISG4. It is part of my duty to receive advertisements, and see that they are inserted in the newspaper. I have no doubt I have all the advertisements that are there. I can swear that this (identifying one) was. They were inserted in the newspaper. The advertisements were inserted the number of times entered in those particulars. Mr. Weston impressed upon the Bench that no authority was admitted by the defendant. Witness: The charges are fair and reasonable. The amount is still due. I saw Mr. Guilding several times about them. He came to the office several times just before the regatta. He handed in the advertisements in the usual way. They were then filed. This document was drawn up by a junior clerk in the office. They are instructions to printers. Instructions would be given to the printers as a rule. Mr. J. B. Russell.—We do not want any rule. Mr. Wvnn said, it was perfectly competent for a wituess to state what was the order of business in an office. Mr. J. B. Russell said that the junior clerk alluded to should be in Court to prove the rule. These advertisements would not have been continued from time to time unless ordered by the defendant. I can show you the printed rules of tlio Southern Cross olllco. Mr. Weston.—We do not want them,'we must not have your rules. Witness : Mr. Guilding came to tho office from time to time to direct certain alterations. By Mr. Weston : The rule is not always that advertisements will be discontinued in cases advertisements are continued to bo inserted until countermanded. These advertisements do not require countermanding; they were put in according to order. The order was " to insert until date." That must have been a verbal order, as it was not marked. I cannot say that I heard the order for the number of insertions as charged for. Reexamined by Mr. Wynn : Mr. Guilding never nade any objection to the appearance of these advertise monts in tho papers. If there was an advertisement ordered to date, as in this case, they wjuld be put in until the date of the meeting. Never had received any orders to tho contrary. Mr. J. B. Kussell suggested that tho Court should ask whether there was not other handwriting than Gwilding's amongst tho documents. Mr. Wynn said that such a question' would open a new and a very long lino of examination. Mr. Russell said that some of the writing was in tho hand of Way mouth, one of the defendants, who h id been struck out. Mr. Brookficld said that Mr. Waymouth's name was not in the declaration. By the Court: There is one document here mark'd to be inserted Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday. We inserted it till day of regatta because there was no instructions upon it. We inserted it because there was no countermand given to discontinue it. Mr. Guilding might have disguised hiß handwriting for all I know. For the defence Mr. J. B. Russell and Mr. Weston briefly addressed the Bench, arguing that the plaintiffs had not made out their case, and that neither the defendants nor any of tho committee were liable. Mr. Wynn made a few remarks upon behalf of the plaintiffs. Judgment deferred until Thursday next. His Worship remarked that certainly one, if not both, of the defendants were liable. GRAHAM AND CO. V. BACON". Claim, £7 10s. Mr. Wynn for tho plaintiff, Mr. Kenny for tho defendant. Mr. Kenny stated that the amount had been paid and receipt received, and K thereiore ho demanded the costs of the day. Mr. Wynn objected that the action had been commenced before the amount was paid. Wm. Bacon, sworn, stated : I have paid the amount now sued for ; it was on the 4th August. I now produce tho receipt. Mr. Beckham: Stand down. Mr. Bacon : I paid the account long ago, sooner than be summoned. I was over-charged. I knew I was imposed upon, for I know good wine Irom bad, and the price of it, its I have been long in the trade. Mr. Beckham : That will do, stand down. Mr. Bacon (excitedly) : No ; I have come here to expose these parties, with whom I have spent thousands of pounds. I am determined to do it. Mr Beckham : Remove that man. An extraordinary scene here occurred, the bailiff endeavouring to remove the defendant, who kept shouting the while, " It's true, your Worship, it's trim " The Court remarked thai there was no doubt judgment must be passed Cor the plaintiff, with costs. His Worship expressed a doubt whether it was not his duty to fine the defendant £10 for contempt, w. c. WILSON v. adkane. Claim, £25 Bs. Bd. Mi. J B. Russell for tho plaiutiff. Defendant did not appear, so judgment was given for tho plaintiff'. P. COYLE V. 11. WUIGHT. No appearance. Nonsuited. YOUNO V. WILSON-. Claim, £24 16s. sd. Mr. Weston appeired for tho defendant, and pleaded minority, he being under age and not liable. Mr. J. B. Russell appeared for the plaintiff. Mr. T. Young examined by Mr. Weston, deposed : —I stipp'ied the goods to defendant, but I do not know hi 3 age. James Wilson, stated : —I am the defendant; my age is 18 years. Mr. Russell objected to this courao of examination, and in tho absence of the defendant's father, judg-

ment was recorded for the plaintiff. His Worship stated that if defendant was a minor, he was a fully grown onei, and evidently'knew well what he was about, , and hoped it would bo a caution to him for the future. ' HV'M r p The Court rose at 4 o'clook, and adjournod until Monday nest. Nga Wiki v. Mo'rgsta : "will be the 1 first case taken. '• mi