Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Magistrate’s Court.

(Before Mr. F. H. Levien, S.M.)

Judgment for plaintiffs by default was given in the following undefended civil cases with costs.

J Urlich v Graham Taitirau claim £47-1-3, with costs£6-6-o; Mangonui Hospital Hoard v Jack Sturmfcls, claim £7-16/-with costs £1 17-6; same v Ben Popata, claim £6 with costs £l-16-6; same v Geo Predecevicb, claim £l3-13-0 with costs £3-0-6 ; same v Perene Mathews, claim £4-8-0 with costs £l-9.6; same v Bowman Yates, claim £4/16/- with costs £l/11/6; same v Sam Noble claim £24/10/-, with costs £4/6/6 ; same v W ilrnout De And red claim £4/16/-, with costs £2 86; Anti Erstich v Henry Popata, claim £ll/7/6, with costs£2/8/6; Dragicevich Bros v Ephliain Walker, claim £4O/8,1 r, with costs £4/13/6; Dan Lunejevich v Paul Smith claim £9/19/8, with costs £2/5/6; Uriich & Uretich v Jack Robson, claim £6/2/9,

with costs £l/15/6; same v Henri Te Awa, claim £B/1/10 with costs £2/0/6; Percy Edwards v Bert Baker, claim £.123/15/- with costs £7/2/0; Slater Bros v Dudly Jameson claim £3-10-0 with costs £l-5-6; Urlich & Uretich'v Wairama Marsh claim £7 with costs £2-6-0; D. McGillivray v H Willis claim £l-13-0 with costs 8/-; Kostanich & Marevicii v Matin Pukeroa claim £97-10, with cost§ £2-2-6; same v J«s Armstrong claim £3-19-2, with costs £l-18-6; same v Kau Nathan, claim £ll-9.2, gwilh costs £3-6-0; same v Friday Reta, claim £22-4.6, with costs £4-14/6; Robt Rowe v Rina Koha & Michael Haney, claim £l4/10/4, with costs £4/19/-; Dragicevich Bros v Jessie Subritzky, claim £27-10-4, with costs £4/6/6. JUDGMENT SUMMONS

T. S. Houston v Ngawali Taitimu, claim £39/15/3, solicitors iec £l-11-6. An order was made for payment forthwith in default 30 days imprisonment in the Kaitaia gaol.

Walter Metcalf v William Popata £7/17 6. An order was made for payment with costs 15/6 in default seven days in Kaitaia gaol. Kauri Timber Coy v L M Timbers (Te Kuiti) claim £43/8/9- An order was made for payment forthwith with solicitors fee £l/11/6 in default 30 days in the Auckland gaol.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NORAG19270223.2.6

Bibliographic details

Northland Age, Volume 26, Issue 40, 23 February 1927, Page 3

Word Count
331

Magistrate’s Court. Northland Age, Volume 26, Issue 40, 23 February 1927, Page 3

Magistrate’s Court. Northland Age, Volume 26, Issue 40, 23 February 1927, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert