WHY SMITH LEFT COURT.
The trial of the Ameirican woman writer for the murder of a Senator has the average number of sensations for which we look in criminal trials across the Atlantic, but so far it has produced nothing to equal the device said to have been practised by a Chicago lawyer. A woman was indicted for murdering her husband by putting poison into the cake which he was to eat. Part of the cake had remained, and was produced in court as evidence. “Why," said counsel for the defence, “I’ll eat some of the cake a*yself,” and, so saying, he popped a piece of the poisoned food into his mouth. As he d'id so a telegram was handed to him. He tore it open and read it, and, telling the judge that his wife had been taken seriously ill, obtained leave of absence to answer the message. Then he came back and gained the acquittal of the prisoner. The truth is that the telegram had been times to arrive so that after eating the cake he might rush out and obtain a strong emetic to counteract the effect of any poison which might remain in the confection.— “Evening Standard."
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NORAG19081005.2.75
Bibliographic details
Northland Age, Volume V, Issue 7, 5 October 1908, Page 8
Word Count
201WHY SMITH LEFT COURT. Northland Age, Volume V, Issue 7, 5 October 1908, Page 8
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Northland Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.