Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Thursday, October 8. CIVIL SIDE.-SPECIAL JURY.

HUTCHINSON V. BklT. *An action for libel. The case was tried at the April sittings of this Court, when the plain* tiff obtained a verdict, with £100 damages. A rule nisi having been granted on the ground of excessive damages,

Mr. Hart appeared for the plaintiff, Mr. Poynter for toe defence. As we stated all the facts of the case in our report of the former trial, it is unnecessary to recapitulate them. After an hours deliberation, the jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff, damages one farthing*

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NENZC18451004.2.5

Bibliographic details

Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 187, 4 October 1845, Page 121

Word Count
94

Thursday, October 8. CIVIL SIDE.-SPECIAL JURY. Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 187, 4 October 1845, Page 121

Thursday, October 8. CIVIL SIDE.-SPECIAL JURY. Nelson Examiner and New Zealand Chronicle, Volume IV, Issue 187, 4 October 1845, Page 121

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert