ALLEGED BREACHES OF AWARD
CASES FURTHER ADJOURNED An indication that lie had altered iis opinion was given by the Magisrate, Mr T. E. Maunsell, this mornng in the case Inspector of Awards Mr D. Rollo) v. W. U. H. Cole & Co., Ad., and several employees, T. ’asker. G. Prestidge, L. G. Wakefield, v I*. Scott, A. Guthrie, W. Krammer nd H. Slatter. The inspector claimed penalty of £4O from the employer nd £2 from each of the employees or alleged breaches of the drivers’ Mr W. V. R. Fletcher had contendd for the defendants that the al"ged breaches were not breaches of he award but of the Transport licensing Goods Services Regulnions. The Magistrate, at the first hearing, aid he held the view, provisionally, hat the Transport Licensing Act ’ould override the award. This mornig. when Mr Fletcher said that Mr toll© would like time io submit .ritten argument, the Magistrate la ted that his present inclination •as to hold that as long as an award as not inconsistent with a statute here was nothing to prevent the ward adopting similar provisions and roviding a collateral penalty. He ms inclined to be against Mr Fletcher t the present time. The p;is£> wfle ;irlii ii ii-ncirl <V.,- •, ... i.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19411013.2.38
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume 76, 13 October 1941, Page 4
Word Count
207ALLEGED BREACHES OF AWARD Nelson Evening Mail, Volume 76, 13 October 1941, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Nelson Evening Mail. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in