Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MARKETING FRUIT IN UNITED KINGDOM

[To the Editor] Sir, —Associations aro being asked to consider certain proposals of the Fruit Control Board anenl the system to be adopted in 1934. Last year 1 supported the Goodwin scheme firstly because the disastrous I returns for 1932 seemed to demand some improvement in our system of distribution and further centralised control, and a guaranteed price seemed to offer this. The guaranteed price did not eventuate, and this year’s operations cannot be claimed to have been any improvement over 1932. Mr Turner claims that this year’s returns will bear comparison with the previous year, but, as has already been pointed out 1932 was a disastrous year; and a continuance would speedily mean bankruptcy for the whole industry, so it must be conceded that the policy, or the effect of the policy operating this year, was failure. We are definitely faced with a curtailment of our marketing season at Home. Already the British growers are restive at our encroaching on what might be termed their legitimate marketing period. Analysis of account sales indicates that a drastic shortening'of the packing period is advisable, also a shortening of the period between orchard and saleroom. This means that a flood of fruit must be disposed of in a limited time and only utilisation of all reliable means of distribution can effect this. Any limiting of the distribution disaster. Centralised co-ordination of these means of distribution should belli the hands of the Board’s representative and not be handed over to any one broker. Regarding account sales, it is sufficient to say that account sales lor the first pool Jonathans the bulk of which were sold in April and May, have not yet come to hand. Beferring lr Argentine credit, I would say that it is more, important to have safe methods for coining seasons than to tie us up to a system of monopoly for the sake of geLting this money.—lj am, ALLEN FORSYTH. Mapua, 28th. Nov.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19331129.2.5

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXVI, 29 November 1933, Page 2

Word Count
329

MARKETING FRUIT IN UNITED KINGDOM Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXVI, 29 November 1933, Page 2

MARKETING FRUIT IN UNITED KINGDOM Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXVI, 29 November 1933, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert