Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

INQUIRY BY COMMITTEE VALUE AS A DETERRENT LONDON, 191 li May. Contrasting views of capital punishment were placed before the Select Committee by the. former Home Secretary, Sir Herbert Samuel, who said in his evidence that if it were shown to bo necessary to take murderers' lives to prevent "murderers taking innocent persons' lives it seemed the legitimate and moral tiling to do. But the system of justice, lie said, ought not to be based in the principle of "tit for tat." The dcatli penalty was justifiable only as a deterrent. Viscount Brentford, also a former Home Secretary, pointed out that the death penalty,was the most dreaded of ill punishments and therefore it ivas the greatest deterrent'.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19300531.2.115

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 31 May 1930, Page 13

Word Count
119

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 31 May 1930, Page 13

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXIV, 31 May 1930, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert