NEW ZEALAND.
SL^he advantage snd what did n< £r B Keeves said that schools exanSedby the State inspectors showed a higher standard thaa others. C. IC. Bbwen supported the mo- * tioa^on the groand that it would afford ffife^lican opporttmity of judging oi of children^ Maine* by ib« State officers and thos« tSVerenvt so inspected. He wasir favJJr^EhaTingone^body of mspectors Sore of whom were needed, ihenu. portance of the periodical inspection especially, in country districts, was not and, in hie opinion, shoolc be increaßed as the scope was itf -rged. Mr J. W. Twpmey opposed the motion. 1 Ihe Minister of Education said th inteniron of the Act of 1887 was to make education cpmposlory, and that ■where children were educated in private school the State should have some £ to whether they were J^g-JpSS educated or not. Ihe ''O; 6 "*",^ edu . given certificates to .^ bL^Ztrte , cated in private some , Civil service. I&*>%zL broad-minded Boards weren^uffi^ l^ Schools, to grant inspectionoj ? J at H M iVfi Government aslf. Parhanient to ta*e * °r / occupied this session in d ?fS eavour to V B6B " 1 AiTSSSS^ Roared wichoab division.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19010726.2.15
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XXXV, Issue 168, 26 July 1901, Page 2
Word Count
185NEW ZEALAND. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XXXV, Issue 168, 26 July 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.