Prosecution under Factories Act.
[United Press Association,] Dunkdin, This Day. The Court held that the purely nieuliiiiiical part of dentistry taken independently of the part performed by the operator was a handicraft, ind that dentistry rooms should be registered aa factories. Mr Armstrong, the defendant, was consequently fined in a nominal penal! \. .Notice of appeal was at once lodged. Abraham Myers was fined 10s and costs in each ol two casea for failing to give those employed in his factoiy a half holiday.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18950523.2.16.4.10
Bibliographic details
Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XXIX, Issue 120, 23 May 1895, Page 3
Word Count
83Prosecution under Factories Act. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XXIX, Issue 120, 23 May 1895, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in