Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Nelson Evening Mail. FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 1869.

We yesterday published a despatch from | Earl Granville to the Government of New ! Zealand, which .we -cannot allow to .pads altogether unnoticed. In order to i thoroughly appreciate tbe friendly feelingtowards New Zealand which prompted the forwarding of this despatch, it must be remembered tbat it left England shortly after the arrival there of the news of the Poverty Bay massacre. The Secretary of State for tbe colonies hears that women and children are being mercilessly butchered in .New Zealand, be knows that nearly the whole of the North Island is in rebellion against the Queen's authority, he must be aware, that the colonists are taxed to ithe utmost of their ability to suppress this rebellion, and yet he inaugurates his accession to office by writing to her Majesty's- representative in ihis colony to say thatf/he 'entirely concurs in so much of his. predecessor's instructions as. required the immediate departnteM tie- troops now remaining in

But one inference cahs ; fce drawn from such a communication -^pjjngland has washed her hands of New 7 Zealand — she has no objection to its being called one of her colonies, she does not mind sending out an officer who shall receive £4,500 a year from the colonists to act in the capacity bf what is, facetiously we suppose, termed the connecting link between the parent country and her offspring, but once apply the money test, ask her, at the cost of a few thousands of pounds to step in and prevent the wholesale butchery of | her children, and it is soon found that the mother's tender care does not prove equaL to the occasion. This is what we are to expect from the English Government, it will be weli to see in what light the English people View the state of affairs in New Zealand, and taking the London Times as a fair exponent of public feeling, we there find in an article on the massacre by tbe Maoris, not a single word of sympathy* not one suggestion that assistance should be rendered to us in our dire necessity, but rather an intimation that we have to thank ourselves for what has occurred, and in fact that it is just what the Times has beeu expecting for some time* After finding fault with everything' we have done, and assuring us that we bave publicly disgraced ourselves, our Mentor goes on to say, that — The New Zealand Executive and Parliament have now at least the stimulus to energy which arises from the consciousness that the eyes of the empire are upon them. They are still free to choose what course they please ; but their countrymen are free to criticise it, and will, the colony may assure itself, exercise their privilege.' Eng* land is at least entitled to demand imperatively that the spectacle shah not continue of an immensely larger body of Englishmen satisfied, if it be peace, to hold their tranquility at the mercy of the caprice or superstition of a few hundred savages, and contented if it be war, provided the contest results in no worse than a certain number of drawn battles. The 'eyes of the empire ' are upon us. What a fund of comfort is there in this thought to the helpless family aroused out of their sleep by tbe yells of the. Maori demons who are bent upon their slaughter; what consolation to the doomed wife and mother as she sees her husband shot down, and her little one's brains dashed out, to know that fche ' eyes of the empire' are upon her, and that although England has refused to render that assistance by wbich she and her family might haye been preserved from destruction, still that she is looking on and calmly contemplating the foul deed. The settler too, who on the faith of English protection has brought his wife and family to settle in New Zealand, is dragged from his peaceful occupation to fight the enemies of England, while her soldiers are dawdling away their time in the towns ; he loses hia life and ieaves his family penniless, but as he breathes his last, he remembers with satisfaction that the ' eyes of the empire' are upon him and that his countrymen in England consider themselves free to criticise his conduct. Again, we are told that England is entitled to demand that we should at once take decisive steps with regard to the Maoris. What has given her this right? Is it her own noble conduct towards us? Does the fact of her lirst involving us in a long and dreary war, and then leaving us to get out of it as bast we may, entitle her to make this demand. Or, supposing for the sake of argument that she is entitled to the privilege claimed for her by the Times, how long is it since she became conscious :of possessing tbis right. We do not remember to have heard anything of it in tbe days when 10,000 of her troops were supposed to be engaged in suppressing the native rebellion. If our memory serves us aright, England did not then imperatively insist upon a decisive blow being struck, had she done so, there would have been no article in the Times, in 1869, on massacres by the Maoris. One serious charge brought against us, is tbat we employ friendly natives to fight for us, and we are told that ' a practice of subsidising certain tribes in order to insure their aid against their countrymen is even more obviously impoltic than it is degrading.' We are not now gcing to enter upon the question of whether or not it is advisable to employ the friendly natives, but we should like to know whether it ever occurred to the writer in the Times tbat it was owing to the fact of our being deserted by our fellow-countrymen, that we were compelled to fall back upon the natives for assistance, and we would take | tbe opportunity of saying that had our countrymen in England proved half as

trustworthy in their dealings with- us, as I certain of the natives, whom it is 'degrading to subsidise * have done, we should not now be involved in such difficulties. Great stress is_, of course, laid on our numerical superiority over the natives, but our exact position appears to be generally misunderstood in England. It is true that we largely outnumber our enemies, but English people might better comprehend the state of affairs if it were put before them in tbe following mannert — Suppose the population of England and Ireland conjointly to be 240,000, sparsely scattered over the area of those two islands two thirds of the number being in England ; the whole adult population dependent upon their own individual exertions to supply bread for themselves ahd their families. The interior of Ireland is occupied by 30,000 hostile natives of nomadic habits, growing their own potatoes, on which they usually live, but at the same time who are ablej. in default of anything better, to exist upon the roots and berries that they find in the woods. These natives from time to time make raids on their civilised neighbors, drive off their flocks and herds, murder the owners, and then retreat to almost impenetrable fastnesses in the wilds of the country i Had ihose in England who talk of our large preponderance in numbers, ever experienced such a state of things they would be better able to understand, how greatly distance and the surrounding circumstances tend to neutralise the seeming advautages of numerical superiority. But we are quite convinced that nothing that can ever be written iu NeW Zealand will be of the slightest avail in inducing England to take an impartial view of our difficulties and our resources; the former are to a great extent ignored, and the latter absurdly magnified} while at the same time the Home Government is getting tired of us, and gradually severing every tie tbat connected the colony with the parent country. The time, we believe;, is not far distant wben the Australasian group will weary of the treatment they receive at the hands of an empire to which they were at one time proud to belong, but whose selfish conduct in graspingly endeavoring to derive all the benefits of the connection, while she will confer none in return, has loosened the hold she at once had on the affections of tbe inhabitants of the noblest of all her colonies.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18690305.2.7

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume IV, Issue 53, 5 March 1869, Page 2

Word Count
1,418

The Nelson Evening Mail. FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 1869. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume IV, Issue 53, 5 March 1869, Page 2

The Nelson Evening Mail. FRIDAY, MARCH 5, 1869. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume IV, Issue 53, 5 March 1869, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert