Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“Only One Argument Counts In N.Z.”-MacKay

The secretary of New Zealand Counties' Association forwarded to the Whangarei County Council yesterday a report on the result of a conference with the Minister for Health on March 17 re hospital rating. The following proposals were discussed:

(1) That hospital rating based on income. salaries and wages replace the present unfair incidence of capital value.

(2) That the bed subsidy of 6/- per day be increased. (3) That after-care of soldiers be a charge on the war expenses account. In June last the Prime Minister said he would agree to No. 3. and that some increase should be made in (2), but he would not consider (1) during the war. Since then no decision had been announced by the Government, and the matters were brought before the Minister for Health by the Counties’ Association.

The Minister stated he would not discuss the incidence question, as the Prime Minister had made a pronouncement last year that no investigation would be made into the problem until affer the war. He did not think an increase in bed subsidy a sound way of securing the relief desired. An increase of 1/would mean a total expenditure of £75.000. He favoured any increase coming from the Consolidated Fund in the form of increased subsidy for maintenance. Further Proposals After the deputation had retired to reconsider their requests to the Government, they submitted the following proposals to the Minister: (1) That future hospital rating should be based on income, salaries and - wages. (2) That all capital costs (past and future) be the sole responsibility of the Government.

(3) That the present scale of maintenance subsidy to hospital boards be increased in the ratio of 3 to 2.

The Minister replied that he did not hold out much hope of the two organisations getting both (2) and (3), but he would present the requests to the Government.

The chairman (Mr. J. A. S. Mac Kay) said he attended a similar conference at which the Minister promised to have an announcement made before March 31.

There was no probability of any alteration of the incidence of taxation affecting salaries and wages or increase in bed subsidies from the Social Security fund. Any change in the incidence of taxation and any further contribution towards occupied beds would be in some way less favourable to present ratepayers.

“The Federation of Labour endorses this policy, and this body practically controls New' Zealand,” Mr. Mac Kay said. “There is only one argument that counts, and that is direct action, the result of which we have recently seen in this and other districts.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19430410.2.22

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 10 April 1943, Page 2

Word Count
437

“Only One Argument Counts In N.Z.”-MacKay Northern Advocate, 10 April 1943, Page 2

“Only One Argument Counts In N.Z.”-MacKay Northern Advocate, 10 April 1943, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert