Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Delay In Watersiders’ New Award

(Per Press Association. Copyright o WELLINGTON, This Day. Replying to a statement by the secretary of the Waterside Employers’ Association, Mr W. H. Bennett, the secretary of the New Zealand Waterside Workers’ Union, Mr J. Roberts, reiterated that he did not want to enter a controversy on the dispute over the delay in obtaining an award. Mr Roberts said the workers had asked for a conference, but the employers had refused. Meetings of a conciliation council were abortive. The Arbitration Court was jointly asked for a date for a hearing, but the Court refused to grant a ciate until the parties had arrived at a further measure of agreement. A further conciliation council meeting was held and some agreement reached between the parties.- As the court was not then functioning the workers asked the employers several times to meet them, but they refused. Employers Blamed. The Minister of Labour, the Hon. P. C. Webb, arranged a conference in December. The employers refused to discuss wages, but desired to refer the question to the court. They had submitted proposals which would cover only 20 per cent, of the men. Regarding the recent Auckland dispute over the stowing of cargo, Mr Roberts repeated that the men did not take direct action. They asked the employer to carry on the work in the same manner as was done at other ports. The employer refused, and, although it was true to say the men were not dismissed, it was also true that the employer said: "Well, you are getting no wages,” which to Mr Roberts meant dismissal. Official reports received at the head office of the union were to the effect that if Wellington had not interfered the dispute would have been adjusted in Auckland without difficulty.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19400221.2.99

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 21 February 1940, Page 6

Word Count
298

Delay In Watersiders’ New Award Northern Advocate, 21 February 1940, Page 6

Delay In Watersiders’ New Award Northern Advocate, 21 February 1940, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert