Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Timely Topics

“There is striking, resemblance between the attitudes' adopted by British statesmep to Bismarck and those

which, afe being adopted how, says “The Scotsman.”

BISMARCK AND HITLER.

“Bismarck’?; own past contributed to ,the distru&t with which he was viewed, so, that even when he meant, peace he could not safely be believed. It may, lj>e said that Herr Hitler is in the sarpe position. Efforts have been made, and are still being made, to discover a basis for establishing normal relations with Germany and Italy. Mi Chamberlain has his peace declaration, M. Bonnet has' Herr Ribbenitrop’s signature to a similar document, | and Mr Chamberlain has also the ‘Rome Treaty; but of a true settle* ment there is not yet a promising sign. In shaping a policy of reconciliation, statesmen cannot move much

ahead of public opinion, Herr Hitler’s ill-treatment of the Jew.i has released a store of public indignation which makes progress toward sbetter ' relations almost impossible v for the I present.” , •.

m SI H ® Some false alarms, h?ve been raised among a section of British industrialists by New Zealand’s decision to i / subject British imports to

N.Z. AND BRITAIN.

new licensing restrictions. . . . Superficially the Brit-

ish manufacturers appear to have a strong case. In 1937 British exports to New Zealand were only £28,000,000 (New Zealand currency) as against £50,000,000: imports;. But this, in the first place, vwasra great improvement, as compared., with the year 1932, when the, figures., were £ 12,575,000 and £31,300,000 respectively. And, secondly, Britain’s invisible exports shipping charges, cost of in* terest, etc., are not. included;in. these figures. :■ - ,rsui-:vr New Zealand found itself recently in the position that its excess-of exports to all- countries was not enough to cover its invisible imports. What was it to do?:: li could rtakemore manufactured goods from-Britain if Britain could contrive to take * more of its farming produce; But the British farming community also has to be considered. In its present distressed state it would Have every reason to complain if it were further , undercut by New Zealand imports in the interest of British manufacturers, Indeed, the time has coined when Dominions like New Zealand and Australia must be expected to tu¥n 7 to the task of developing rhahufacturing industries of their own. If' this 'bourse is followed, the Dominions irtay become more prosperous and have more to spend; in the long run they; may be larger importers than they are now. It may well be that this will be better for both countries, and better for the Empire. >■

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19390220.2.73

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 20 February 1939, Page 6

Word Count
419

Timely Topics Northern Advocate, 20 February 1939, Page 6

Timely Topics Northern Advocate, 20 February 1939, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert