Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GROCERY SHOP MANAGERS

INTERPRETATION OF AWARD. r Per Press Association. — Convriqht.j WELLINGTON, This Day. Whether grocery shop managers in Canterbury are bound by the award covering other employees in the trade was the principal topic in the hearing of a dispute in the Arbitration Court yesterday. Decision was reserved. The applicant was the Canterbury Master Grocers’ Industrial Union of Employers. Its claims were contested by the Canterbury Grocers Assistants’ Industrial Union of Workers. The Employers’ Union claimed there was a valid separate agreement with the branch managers. This contention was opposed by the Workers’ Union. The recently-formed Canterbury Chain Stores Managers’ Union made a submission that the managers were “occupiers” of the shops, and, therefore, should not be included in the award covering assistants.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19350813.2.91

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 13 August 1935, Page 7

Word Count
124

GROCERY SHOP MANAGERS Northern Advocate, 13 August 1935, Page 7

GROCERY SHOP MANAGERS Northern Advocate, 13 August 1935, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert