Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WRONGLY NAMED

PUZZLE FOR SUPREME COURT,

WELLINGTON', This Day,

Resident only .10 months *sn the Dominion, Mrs Mary Ann Buckley left a legacy estimated at between £ISOO and £I7OO to the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Now Zealand. There is no such Society, and the Supreme Court has to decide . whether Wellington was intended to benefit, or whether the various Societies of New Zealand should share. All but three are represented by counsel. The Otago, Auckland and Hawke’s Bay Societies are not represented, but have agreed to abide by whatever decision is arrived at.

The Court has reserved its decision. —Press Assn.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19280203.2.81

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 3 February 1928, Page 8

Word Count
106

WRONGLY NAMED Northern Advocate, 3 February 1928, Page 8

WRONGLY NAMED Northern Advocate, 3 February 1928, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert