Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CRIMINAL SESSIONS. WELLINGTON, This Day. At the Supreme Court G. A. Jenness, a jeweller, was acquitted on two charges of theft of a diamond pendant and was convicted for obstructing the course of justice, with a strong recommendation to leniency on the ground that accused had not acted with the intention of benefiting himself. Sentence was deferred.

George Arthur Jenness was later brought before the Court again and was fined £20. Counsel for accused said he had been guilty of a mistaken sense of his obligat : on to the woman who had sold the pendant to him and had not realised his obligations to the police. His character was excellent, and "he had been in business in the city for 27 years. —Press Assn.

Cyril Wagstaff pleaded guilty to a charge of indecent assault and was remanded for sentence. —Press Assn.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19240731.2.21

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 31 July 1924, Page 5

Word Count
143

SUPREME COURT. Northern Advocate, 31 July 1924, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Northern Advocate, 31 July 1924, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert