JUDGMENT SUMMONSES.
' Jas. (Mr Briggs) v. Holton, a Sudgma^fe'summons for £3 9s 4d. An made for payment forthwith less '£&; in default 14' clays, the warrant to be suspended for 14 days.
L. Drummond (Mr Steadman) v. C. 'Galbraith (Mr Carruth), a judgment summons for £11 4s Bd. Defendant's solicitor applied for an adjournment till the ISth, pending the completion of negotiations for the sale of certain lands in which the defendant was interested. Mr Steadman objected to an adjournment, and an order was made for payment forthwith; in default, 3 4 ■ilays, the order to be suspended till October 18th. Mr Killen objected to the order, as solicitor for the principal creditor in the estate. Such an order •would drive the defendant into rhe Bankruptcy Court, and the probability in that case r would be that none of the creditors would get anything. It liad been agreed by the creditors to wait till certain arrangements had been made about the payment of his debts. Ventry A. J. Smith (Mr Steadman) v. C. Galbraith, a judgment summons for £5 15s 6d. An order was made for payment forthwith, the warrant to be suspended till October 18th.
J. Hoey (Mr Briggs) v. W. Primrose, a judgment summons for £12 7s 6d. order was made for payment of the amount forthwith, less £3. *
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19100920.2.15.2
Bibliographic details
Northern Advocate, 20 September 1910, Page 5
Word Count
220JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. Northern Advocate, 20 September 1910, Page 5
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Northern Advocate. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.