Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HODGE V. DARGAVILLE.

I ■'..: % Auckland, Thursday. ! Xbt the E.M. Court to-day, William Hoilg-e, electioneering agent, sued J. M r)argafi_le^oT==^,-the Httie bill being as follows : For services rendered at tho City West Mectios^lSiS^^^nd acting as scrutineer at same, £10. By cash on account, por .A. G.lover/£5 ; Balance due £5. Hodge deposed that in July, 1834 he was in Auckland -Hotel with. Dargayille and Glover. Dargaville asked^Glover whether he could get him a .good scrutineer and said he would not- mind giving £10 for a good, man. Glover said witness would make' a good Ibrutineer, and he engaged him accordingly. Glover deposed £5 was sufficient payment, and Hodge was therefore non-suited in the case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA18871008.2.26.1

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 8 October 1887, Page 5

Word Count
112

HODGE V. DARGAVILLE. Northern Advocate, 8 October 1887, Page 5

HODGE V. DARGAVILLE. Northern Advocate, 8 October 1887, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert