Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Question Unanswered

Mr. Ginnell (in the House of Com* ajpns) asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if he would explain why Essen had been immune from attack by British aircraft? .The First Lord'of. the. .Admiraltj (Mr.. Balfour): I do not think it would be desirable to discuss military operations, actual or by Question and answer.

Mr. Ginnell: WILL THE RUSH! HON. GENTLEMAN INFORM I'HB HOUSE WHETHER THE IMMUNITY OF ESSEN HAS ANY CONNECTION VZ$& THE FINANCIAL IN-TERN-IN SUBSIDIARY FIRMS' HELDi BY MEMBERS OF THE BRITISH CABINET?

No answer was vouchsafed? The Ministerial silence on the point is significant.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MW19160913.2.27

Bibliographic details

Maoriland Worker, Volume 7, Issue 291, 13 September 1916, Page 4

Word Count
100

A Question Unanswered Maoriland Worker, Volume 7, Issue 291, 13 September 1916, Page 4

A Question Unanswered Maoriland Worker, Volume 7, Issue 291, 13 September 1916, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert