Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Police Ordered to Produce Statement in Court

JUDGE HOLDS PRIVILEGE NOT SUBSTANTIATED. Per Press Association. AUCKLAND, Last Night. Holding that no grounds upon which privilege was claimed had been put forward, Mr Justice Callan in the Supreme Court ruled that the unsigned statement made to a police constable •should be produced in evidence during the hearing of a claim for £2OOO brought by a farmer against a sawmiller for the loss of plaintiff’s wife in a motor accident.

Mr North, for the defence, called Superintendent Till, of Auckland, and asked him to produce a statement made by the driver of a motor-car to the police. Superintendent Till claimed privilege, saying that he had been instructed to do so. The statement was not signed and the maker of it was not a party to the action.

Ilis Honour: Well, superintendent, with regard to your point that the statement is not signed, I take it that what counsel is endeavouring to prove is something said to the constable by the person who did not sign the statemelt. If the constable could remenfber what was said, I would rule he could give evidence. Your further point that the person making the statement was not a party to the action before the Court makes no difference to your superior officer. Who has given you instructions to claim privilege!

Superintendent Till: The Commissioner of Police. I have his memorandum here.

His Honour said his view was that if privilege was to be claimed, something further from a Minister of the Crown should be before the Court. The grounds for making the claim in tho State's interest should be set out. While not expressing an opinion whether the claim for privilege was sound or not, his Honour said lio did not consider, in view of the method oy which the claim was made, the Court should take any action at all. The grounds upon which it -was based were not placed before the Court and he would rule that the statement should oe produced. Superintendent Till then handed the document to Constable Huckstep, who had taken the statement and who used a portion of it in evidence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19370527.2.28

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 124, 27 May 1937, Page 6

Word Count
361

Police Ordered to Produce Statement in Court Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 124, 27 May 1937, Page 6

Police Ordered to Produce Statement in Court Manawatu Times, Volume 62, Issue 124, 27 May 1937, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert