Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FOREIGN POLICY.

NEW DIFFICULTIES MADE, ON ACCOUNT OF INDIAN ( DESPATCH. ; ERROR OF JUDGMENT. ' I [By Electric Cable—Copyright.) [Anal. and N.Z. Cable Association.i (Received Wednesday, 10 p.m.) LONDON, March 14. i In the House of Lords, Lord 1 Curzon said Mr Montagu's action had s graveiy unvoted tue position of the - British delegates ul me forthcoming I j Near East Conference at Baris. At u 1 Caumet meeting iienl bn March ath, he ’> suggested to Mr Montagu that the e publication of Lord Reading s deft snatch sauuld not be authorised with- ’ out reference to Cao.net and was t dumbfounded to learn that Mr Mon- ■ tagu had aiready authorised it. He r ' naturany thought it too late to inters veiie and subsequently ho wrote to Mr ~ Montagu privately protesting against f it. He regretted that Mr Montagu, instead of speaking in the Commons, had gone to ii is constituency and i traversed both their conversation and 7 the • speaker’s letter, in which after i ! deploring Mr Montagu’s action he said 1 that if he, when v iceroy, had ventured thus to refer to European s countries’ foreign policy he would n have been recalled. The letter went e , on to slate that Mr Chamberlain y | agreed it was intolerable that " a subordinate Government like that of India should seek to dictate the hues ’’ it thought Britain ought to follow as 3 regards Thrace and Smyrna.. J: Lord Crewe agreed that Mr Montagu iiad broken the Cabinet pro’o prieties, the effect of which, on Europe and India, was the most ims j porlant consideration. The opinions (j of the Government of India were well d known, therefore he thought publicae tion was not likely to altect the Near . East Conference. I PRINCIPLES AND PATRIOTS. it ci (Received Wednesday, S p.m.) h LONDON, March 14. it Captain W. Wedgwood Bean, in the 1- Commons, raised the Egyptian quese i tion. He said the Government had d i now conceded Zaghlul’s demands, but .rlwhat was it going to do about that yj patriot? irl Mr Chamberlain, replying, recalled I- Zaghlul’s record, which he declared e was a very bad one. He was a fold lower of Arabi Pasha and was an open sympathiser with Turkey during the war. He was the initiator of a violent campaign which terminated in disturbances in March, 1919. There was a sigh of relief when lie was deported and he would not be brought t- back while he was a danger to the K peace of Egypt.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19220316.2.21

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2075, 16 March 1922, Page 5

Word Count
418

FOREIGN POLICY. Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2075, 16 March 1922, Page 5

FOREIGN POLICY. Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2075, 16 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert