Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LITTLE SHOCK FOR TOBACCO SMOKERS.

It is assumed by 9!) smokers out of 100, without any particular justification beyond the known fact that tobacco smoke disagrees with the comfort of the green-fly, that if they smoke with consistent regularity they render themselves relatively safe from disease. During the influenza epi. demies especially, it, is highly popular and soothing theory that there is wisdom in this advice — Let those now smoke who never smoked before. And those who always smoked now " smoke the more. But the "Lancet" has been attempting to shako the faith of enthusiasts by pointing out that we cannot be so sure, after all. The smoke problem is a real one, to which no very definite answer seems to have been given. Tobacco certainly has a destructive effect on germs that have, been prepared for laboratory but the conditions are rather different when the microbes have established themselves in the mouths of pipe and cigarette smokers. An Italian pro. fessor has, however, taken the inquiry a stage further by experimenting on the effect of tobacco smoke in the human mouth. It is a little discouraging to find his conclusion to be that "a bacteriological action was only shown to follow the. consumption of very large quantities of tobacco, and then only on micro-organisms ot least resistance, such as the meningococcus and cholera vibrio." In other words, comments an apparently disillusioned writer in the Manchester "Guacdian," the smoker would have to tfinoke very hard and very long, and then only interfere with the weaklings of the hostile force. There is, however, another side to the matter —what may be termed the spiritual as opposed to the physical side. As long as the prodigious smoker firmly believed that by prodigious smoking he was warding off an attack of influenza during a severe epidemic, he was undoubtedly putting him. self in a frame of mind calculated to give him a greater resisting power against ,1:110 onset of the disease. If

the scientific truth of the matter, generally disseminated by non-smok-ers who hate,tobacco, causes him to lose his faith, he will be less psychologically immune. Bui, after all, he may do well to continue to smoke hygienically —as long as ho can avoid smoker's heart. The theory that he loves has not yet been incontcstably disproved, and at any rate he is reasonably safe from the meningococcus and cholera vibrio, —The "Hospital."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19210217.2.6

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume XLII, Issue 1741, 17 February 1921, Page 2

Word Count
400

LITTLE SHOCK FOR TOBACCO SMOKERS. Manawatu Times, Volume XLII, Issue 1741, 17 February 1921, Page 2

LITTLE SHOCK FOR TOBACCO SMOKERS. Manawatu Times, Volume XLII, Issue 1741, 17 February 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert