Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VALUATION CHANGES

MAKERUA ASSESSMENT.

DISSATISFACTION VOICED

Dissatisfaction with the revaluation of properties in its area effected by the Valuation Department was expressed by the Makerua Drainage Board, at. a meeting to-day, uhen statistics were tabled indicative of the alterations made. Members expressed the opinion that there appeared to be inconsistency between the valuations or the Manawatu and Makerua areas, and steps were taken to ascertain it a protest can be lodged along these lines. The clerk (Air N. I. Nielsen), who reported that new rate demands had been sent out following the decision, on objections to the department s adjustments, submitted figures indicative of the reductions effected in valuations. These were as follow: — CLASS A. £ Old valuation 333,380 New valuation 257,440 Reduction <5,940 Percentage reduction 22.7 CLASS B. Old valuation 207,980 New valuation 1/4,006 Reduction 33,930 Percentage reduction 16.3 CLASS C. Old valuation New valuation 1»,04U Reduction 1,120 Percentage reduction 5.7 Air Nielsen added that an estimated rate of £2758 had been made, and following the assessment the actual rate strucii was £2744. . . “I do not know what the position is going to be. Very substantial reductions have been made in the Manawatu area,” remarked the chaiiman (Mr H. Seifert). He had read that the chairman of the Assessment Court had said it would deal with the position of those who had not lodged objections. Possibly the Makerua Board would fall into this category. “It is a question of common justice. I do not know but that we ought to call a special meeting,” added Mr Seifert. . Mr W. Jackson;. Wait till the Alanawatu assessment is finalised. Mr,J. D. Aitchison: The whole thing is that they have admitted it was too high. . Air Seifert: It’s a serious matter. Mr H. Alexander: It is more than a serious matter. How are we going to go on P Mr Jackson moved, and Air Alex 1 - ander seconded, a motion that it bo left in the hands of the chairman, Mr Aitchison and Air Nielsen to ascertain what could be done. Air Jackson added to his motion that a legal opinion be ascertained on the council’s position, and in this form it was carried.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19391214.2.41

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 14, 14 December 1939, Page 8

Word Count
361

VALUATION CHANGES Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 14, 14 December 1939, Page 8

VALUATION CHANGES Manawatu Standard, Volume LX, Issue 14, 14 December 1939, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert