Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RANSOM NOTES.

THE LINDBERGH CASE. FLEAIINGTON, Jan. 16. _ Four more handwriting experts in the Lindbergh kidnapping case, testifying for the State, to-day further iden_ tified Bernard Hauptmann’s handwriting as the same as that of the ransom notes. This brings tho total to eight experts who express the absolute conviction that both are a product of the same person. The contention of the defence that Fiseli copied Hauptmann’s style in order to incrimina.te the defendant, while he himself was responsible for the crime, was considered untenable by the experts, who said that it could not be done.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19350118.2.104

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LV, Issue 43, 18 January 1935, Page 7

Word Count
96

RANSOM NOTES. Manawatu Standard, Volume LV, Issue 43, 18 January 1935, Page 7

RANSOM NOTES. Manawatu Standard, Volume LV, Issue 43, 18 January 1935, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert