Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Per Press Association. NEW PLYMOUTH, Dec. 8. Tire question of whether the New Plymouth Finance Company had, by its course of business during three years when it was not registered under the Aloneylenders’ Act, brought itself within the definition of moneylender under the Act has been decided by Air Justice Reed in a Supreme Court action, the reserved judgment being given to-day. Plaintiff, Edward Drake Ansford farmer, of Omata, alleged that defendants had been carrying on business as . unregistered moneylenders at the time when he executed certain securities for advances made, and on that ground he sought to have the securities declared void. The judgment is in favour of plaintiff who is given the order prayed for.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19321208.2.23

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 9, 8 December 1932, Page 2

Word Count
119

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 9, 8 December 1932, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 9, 8 December 1932, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert