Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAR GUILT.

FRENCH RETICENT. LONDON, Sept. 28. Considering how President Hindenburg’s “war guilt” speech, and Dr. Stresemann’s endorsemnt of it shocked French susceptibilites, 6ays the Pans correspondent of the Times, it is remarkable that the French official spokesmen said so little in reply. M. Briand said nothing. M. Poincare only made a passing refrence to it, he points out, and from this it may be fairly concluded that their reticence means that they have agreed that the wisest policy is to say nothing a policy which even the press is adopting- , There is only tho most general comment on the lines that history alone can establish causes and responsibilities and that talk of-it now only excites opinion on both sides of the frontier and hinders tho cause of peace.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19271015.2.26

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLVII, Issue 272, 15 October 1927, Page 2

Word Count
129

WAR GUILT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLVII, Issue 272, 15 October 1927, Page 2

WAR GUILT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLVII, Issue 272, 15 October 1927, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert