Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

APPEAL AGAINST MAGISTRATE’S RULING. DISPUTED DECISION. Per Press Association. GREYMOUTH. July 19. The Arbitration Court has allowed llic appeal of Air Tyson, Inspector ol Awards, against the Magistrate’s decision of February 12 last dismissing i charge against local tobacconists ol opening their shops on New Year’s Eve in addition to the ordinary late nigln in the same week. The Magistrate Hold that opening was permitted by clause 20 of the award. My Justice Frazer to-day said that nothing in the award could co-operate in a contradiction of the Shops and Offices Act. Tho court had been delegated legislative powers, hut could not go contrary to the Act any more than could a local body in any contravention of flic Municipal Corporations Act. Air Tyson also appealed for a ruling as to whether the Watersiders’ Union, in refusing membership of a certain applicant against whom there was no strong evidence of had character or insobriety, had lost thereby his right to preference. The union secretary. Mr Kirk, stated that two men had left work on the wharf owing to applicant’s behaviour. and several complaints were received from other watersiders respecting the applicant’s alleged bullying habits. The applicant was expelled from the union for arrears in subscriptions, which later were paid when he applied for readmission. The applicant had used abusive language- towards Mr Kirk.

Judge Frazer declared that within the strict legal definition “good character” might cover the applicant’s case and his reasonable sobriety was unquestioned. The question of the union’s justification in refusing membership lead to a broader interpretation of character, which included temperament, etc. The court could not hold that the union’s action was frivolous and therefore the right to preference was unsacrificed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19240721.2.107

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIV, Issue 1073, 21 July 1924, Page 11

Word Count
286

ARBITRATION COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIV, Issue 1073, 21 July 1924, Page 11

ARBITRATION COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIV, Issue 1073, 21 July 1924, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert