Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REPORT ON A PETITION.

’LI B CASH 0 V P. W. O’SULLIV-VN

The Defence Committee, reportin' yesterday to the House of Keprosenta tives on the petition of Patrick y Sullivan, of Palmerston North, who sought compensation tor wrongful arrests, recommended that the petition should be referred jo the Government “ for consideration.” . , j\l,. H K. Holland (Puller) objected to this report, tie argued that the case was clearly one in which the committee should have brought down a favourable report. O’Sullivan was a man who had three tunes enlisted am tried to go to the front. He had a n discharged finally as medically unlit. Viter this he had been arrested on a charge of failing to parade lor medical examination. On a later occasion still ho had been arrested tor alleged - section o„ .v warrant wlnch !*■ IW mime of Cornelius 0 Snllnan. tained a writ of habeas corpus and the military authorities had to rehmse ils they could not show cause toi his d toil thin. As the result of his arrests he p,'suffered loss. Air Holland moved that the petition should be referred back to the committee for furthei umsuhiatum. (!lenn (itangitikci) said that the Defence Committee had heard tlie case a year ago. and had then come „ „ unanimous decision. Hfttm* P<* Li been brolißht forward tins session. Mr J S. Dickson (Parnell said that the committee at the first «rm| o the ease had not been satisfied with the evidence of the petitioner, am particularly with the way m which the petitioner made up his state men • losses due to imprisonment. Hick w. . only' one member of the committee who had not heard the case last yeai. The motion to table the report was talked out.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19220201.2.58

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 317, 1 February 1922, Page 5

Word Count
288

REPORT ON A PETITION. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 317, 1 February 1922, Page 5

REPORT ON A PETITION. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLIII, Issue 317, 1 February 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert