Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LATER.

HEAD I WIN: TAIL YOU LOSE. FIVE SAMPLEToF GERMAN DIPLOMACY. GREY WAS NOT CAUGHT.

Received September 1. 1.40 p m „.. „ . LONDON. Aug. 31. 1 ie Foreign Ofliee has issued a statement in reply to the Nord Deutsche Ailgemeine AciUmg s article early in July, claiming that Dr. Bethmann Hoi!weg made proposal* f"i limitation of armaments, which Britain rejected.

Ilio horeign Office -tatcs tLat Hollwcg ckcHi.-d to |/,rcl llaULmo five clauses to I :<• iffrct tliat neither partv sliouid prepare "-' make an unprovoked attack or join a «-.in-.litnatK>ii ngain-t the other for the pur |i!w of uggrc**ion It either Imxxmic tn • angled in a -.\ar wherein it cannot bo said j • !•■• |he aggressor, the other partv will a< |ea>t obM'rve a benevolent neutrality, and ""•its inmost indeavcurs to locah'xi the conflict. Jf either be forced io go to war I'v the übviuito provocation of a third partv. they hind themselves to exchange views coii cvrnimr tin ir attitude. This dutv of neutrality l. void if not reconcilable with exi*tin~ agreement.*. an<l making of new agree menu, rendering it importihle for either party to ol«.erv<. neutrality ,s excluded llkv rendition*, although apparently f n ir were really groaJy one-siiiiti. German-., owing to tier treaties, would remain frco Jo ««PJ>ort her friends, but Britain would •><• lorbiddcn <o raise a fmg r to defend he» Sir Inward Gi.y therefore reject- ". ' ,cm - On the 14 March hj« • •H-rcd a fonnuiae which Cabinet -ppror.-a to the r-ffict that Kngland would mak> no i.ni.nn.M attH: on (krmanv. niialiv il becsuv obvioti; h.u Germany'* r»al chji-ct was to obtain England's neu inlrv in all eventualities, and if war brt',•■• ut Germany would certainly contend it wr.s forred on her. An admirable ex ar-.i|.!.- i; the pr-senf war, which Germany

coi.kuu, was Joreo<| „por, |, or . Bab. though ucr alb with S)Kcinl sourt-es of in form; i:on. docs not share GermanCs view ivgarritng this aggressive war. Count Met ternich'6 instructions showed that Hollweg would only recommend ilk- K;n-er to en--up i!i«. .v.. i.c* «,f the Navv Bill if Brilai:; promised absolute mntraliiy. The negotia Hon, thus concluded, (he Navy Bill pro ( ed. 1 r.nd the hope of neutral reduction <>t ."rn.tmeuts ended. WHEAT NEGLECTED. Received Septend>er 1. 1.3-j pm LONDON. Aug. 31. Wheat is neglected. Pacific bbi|>ments (VI. Indian Ls lower.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19150901.2.22

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XLI, Issue 10164, 1 September 1915, Page 5

Word Count
381

LATER. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLI, Issue 10164, 1 September 1915, Page 5

LATER. Manawatu Standard, Volume XLI, Issue 10164, 1 September 1915, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert