Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

S.M. Court.

PALMERSTON—TUESDAY.

(Before Mr A. D. Thomson/ S.M.)

CIVIL CASES

•Judgment for the plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs, was entered in the following undefended cases :—C. M. Ross and Co. (Mr Innes) v. L. Snow, £6, costs and fee 23s Gd • Parkins and Att field (Mr Wither) v. J. McTaggart, £5 5s <Jd, costs and fee 23s Gd ; H. Arnott (Mr Jnnes) v. W. Brady, £12 19s 9c,\ 1 costs? and fee 30s (>d ; M. Cottle (Mr Meatyard) v. A. Rosanoski, £1 10s, costs 5s ; Millar and Giorgi (Mr Moore) v. J. E. Jensen, £3 7s 9d, costs and fee 235. DEPENDED CASES. W. M. Service and E. Burns (Mr Hurley) v. Oates, Lowry, and Co. (Mr Baldwin), claim £30, connnis'sion aliened to bfe due on the s.-ilc' of a motor car. The case was partly heard last Court day and adjourned till to-day. The defence set up was that the car had been sold through the agency of Mr T. C. Fowler, and. not through the plaintiffs. Evidence was given this morning by Mr J. Tennent, purchaser of the car, as to the circumstances leading up to his purchase of it. Counsel addressed the Court at length, ' both on the facts and the law. 0. Austin, who accompanied Mr Tennent when he went to the plaintiff Burns' shop, was called by the Court, and gave evidence corroborative of that given by Burns as to what took place at the shop when witness and Mr Tennent wont there and met Burns and subsequently Edmondson, agents for the 6-jfend.iiits in charge of the car.' Judgment was reserved. Morford • Cottle (Mr Meatyard) v. S. T. Hunt (Mr Baldwin), claim £5 10s, balance of amount due k.v dental services. The, amount was disputed on the grounds that certain false teeth made were not satisfactorily fitted, and were of no value to the patient.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19040607.2.36

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7857, 7 June 1904, Page 5

Word Count
313

S.M. Court. Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7857, 7 June 1904, Page 5

S.M. Court. Manawatu Standard, Volume XL, Issue 7857, 7 June 1904, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert