Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Referring tothe charge of cannibalism now pending against the survivors of the ill-fated yacht Mignonette, the law Journal says; — "The story of the yaught Mignonette raises no legal objection about which there can be any real doubt. English law does not recognise necessity as an excuse for crime. Hunger is no defence for a charge of larceny, still less is it a defence to a charge of murder. Tiiere is authority m the books for saying that if two drowning men grasp a plank which will only support one it is not homecide for one to push the other off. This is looked upon as a sort of act of self-defence, and is as far as the law goes m admitting the plea of necessity. Ordinarly. necessity m English law means compulsiou by threats of life and limb."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS18841202.2.9

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 147, 2 December 1884, Page 2

Word Count
138

Untitled Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 147, 2 December 1884, Page 2

Untitled Manawatu Standard, Volume VIII, Issue 147, 2 December 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert