THE SPEC GULLY DISPUTE.
TO «HK EDITOR. Stß,—t obse.ve Mr G. F. Rowlatt dei.Vs that he the charges made by Mr Ryan agiinjt Mr Wood. It would n:jt to ■»! o;e.her without interest at the present juncture if were to return specific answrr, to the following questions : . Did he ever, prior to the heaiin" before Mr Revel', lead Hie issues of The Chkoxic/le >..( the Mrd antT3Bta which contain v. report cf the refusal of Mr Ryan's replication for a tai -race ?
2. Did Mr Ryan, at onv lim» subsequent to -Mr Rowla t'« re.uin lo af~er his absence iherefiom in May, ISSS, ever infova-. bim of the fact of the hearing and refusal of tiiat application ? 3. 1« >Le following parssraph in Thb CdkoM<xk> reim.'t of the procee ings before MiResell a co- 'eoc or inco'i-ect statement o r »h»t took place :—«« Mrßowlatt snid tbe apP'ication had never been decided by the court lo his Jc*oml'.dge \ that at the time it was said to have betn ueaid be was absent from the district; ami that Mr Ryan did not attend the Itcaring, tilher personally or by agent." Mr Bowlitt'a reply will ba looked forward to wilh much interest.—Yours, E.R.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MIC18870224.2.9.2
Bibliographic details
Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume XVII, Issue 998, 24 February 1887, Page 3
Word Count
198THE SPEC GULLY DISPUTE. Mount Ida Chronicle, Volume XVII, Issue 998, 24 February 1887, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.