Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MUST A COMMITTEE RENEW A LICENSE ?

I _^* IMPORTANT JUDGMENT OF TnE SUPREME COURT. ■ (UNITED TRESS ASSOOI ATION.) WRiXTN-rroN, July 7. An application for a mandr>nins to compel the Cjok Licensing Cominittnn to grant a ronowal of the liocn-ic to tho Princo of Walos Hotel, Tory -street, was argued m thb Supreme Court to-day. Mr Justine Uinh-nnitd hn'.d that the Committeo was a fribun.-il app ■iutud by* tilt* Logisl itiiro, ami that thf Siipivurw Court could not intorforo. His llntortonk time to consider whothor it waa neo-a-ury to hear tho Attoriicy-Gmoral on hehilf of tho Committeo. [This is precisely tho decision which was givon m Blenheim hy the Supro.ne Court m tho Grovo Town Hotol owe. Ed. Express.]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX18860708.2.11

Bibliographic details

Marlborough Express, Volume XXII, Issue 159, 8 July 1886, Page 2

Word Count
117

MUST A COMMITTEE RENEW A LICENSE ? Marlborough Express, Volume XXII, Issue 159, 8 July 1886, Page 2

MUST A COMMITTEE RENEW A LICENSE ? Marlborough Express, Volume XXII, Issue 159, 8 July 1886, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert