Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EDITOR v. PRINCESS.

CLAIM ON A BILL. PRINCESS WINS. 8Y ELECTRIO TELEGRAPH.—COPYRIGHT, CEK UNITED PRKSS ASSOCIATION. Received January 29, 8.5 a.m. LONDON, Jan. 28. In the Stead case judgment was en, tered for defendant because the bill in question was an accommodation bill. In the King's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice, Mr W. T. Stead, editor of the 'Review of Reviews,' sued to recover £llOO sterling, which he advanced to a tradesman on a bill transaction to oblige the Princess Wiasemsky. Mr Stead made the Princess' acquaintance through the Dowager Empress of Russia, at the Hague Conference, and the transaction arose through the renting of a house at Dulwich. JMr Stead already has a judgment for £7OO against the Princess. He held' security in connection with the present advance, but returned it to oblige her.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ME19120129.2.34

Bibliographic details

Mataura Ensign, 29 January 1912, Page 5

Word Count
138

EDITOR v. PRINCESS. Mataura Ensign, 29 January 1912, Page 5

EDITOR v. PRINCESS. Mataura Ensign, 29 January 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert