DUNEDIN SUPREME COURT.
-i it. j BMACH OV PBQMISB. : J r nlhej breach gf .'promise case,, Fvnmore v. .SS2? i lll Tuesda 3< The piaiatifE. claimed WfiO damages. She was a widow 1 with eight m^,tm®zjmmßmmi9» l tod nbw in Dunedin. She atatea tkatiitw whom acitil engiaeer,4»aidfoiWtf«i«manateer of BiAce's flour mills, but now in Dunedin, used no visit her frequently in timaru. »nd madeicertafifi-jp^oaals. bh^ ftated^WmrS^.* ■MrtsiptGf their intim«^JCl4aCl&fanfc vim born b April, 1883. BhT now knew S5 def endant was a married mTmT bat did not know, it -until., shel^fi^fed^aSceMlfea^! mty pf ihe' ifdld. i&d^iaW^XiT "I h f wa » a'-Maf^ied' man^.tHeicirtedolbfwisit -i Plaintiff ,n,Xima^, bat., it AW,£££Ehm *• found plain tifi'a; daughter AdM [ » VeS^ff. K/ gaging child.' He -'fchl^^tf » c4Sbu^^« aliudpd to,Wnd ! t6 W"' M^WrfSffifflf i)B) ...i.: ! .:,.,,oTt :/l fj-;v yh{7h . f . K/ , u/:Ofn , -claiJ L250, for^he $jffl3ffib^K«J jjeiy ktraorWsr^ 1 BSmmuniSSf^M wS?' k teach ? r in one «*-*» city school "SS??"* """W'^WnrtW ut^fplainti*; .because he was of delicate, ccnsStion an<f • ghe defenoe was^that &*'&£&s^f 3 W" ° X t er * e °?P° sed to the^ni'aMaS^). and thai r!fK" e f en i ant wrote thftJettar in good COStSt, . , „,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ME18840620.2.18
Bibliographic details
Mataura Ensign, Volume 7, Issue 367, 20 June 1884, Page 2
Word Count
187DUNEDIN SUPREME COURT. Mataura Ensign, Volume 7, Issue 367, 20 June 1884, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in