LUMSDEN.
Saturday, 27th J-Ktxaby, 1883. j (Before H. McOullobh, Eaq„ 8.M.) j Madden v, Pickens — Charge of resoling cattle while they were being impounded on 22nd Deoember last,: j W, Madden, teacher, stated? On 22nd Deoember I saw a heifer trespassing on jmy crops. I drove it into my yard and * tied it up there. The ground it was trespassing ou was a 20-aore paddock, the school glebe, substantially fenced. About two hours |fter I had tied up the heifer, Mr Pickens ckme np and said that it was his heifer. I ;told him that it was impounded and 2s damages olaimed before it could be released. Hej be-: came abusive and took the heifer away|. I cautioned him he was doiag an illegal aot. Cross-examined : Defendant's son cjame first for the heifer. I Bwear defendant j did not offer the 2s when he came for the heifer. The money was offered after the heifer !had been released but I refused it.- j Defendant deposed that his boy told jhim the heifer was impounded and that j Mi Madden claimed 2s. Went to Mr Madden and offered him the 2s before he went near the heifer. Told him it was a shame, to have the heifer tied up as she was, with a thiol* rope round her neok that nearly strangled her. Cross-examined : Offered the money a second time through my little girl. Bradmore and Co. v. Boss— Claim of £16 7s 9d on a dishonored bill, Judgment f6r plaintiff with costs 20s. Gibson v Bennett — Claim £9 4a 8d on aa 1.0.U. for money lent. Judgment for plaintiff with costs 21s, Stanford v Clements— Claim £1 9s for goods. Judgment for claim and costs 10a. ■''"' Burnett v Weir^- Olaim £5 19a 1 ..Judgment for £5 and costs 21s. Beer v Selwood — Claim £20 5s for carriage of poison and skins. Mr W. Henderson for plaintiff, who was non-suited without costs. Southern v Garth waite— Olaim £13 13s Bd. Judgment for olaim and costs 19s. Malone v Howarth— Olaim £36, damage
done by tresspass of pigs in a garden. In this oase plaintiff and his witnesses could not assess the damages and defendant's witnesses assessed them at about 30r Judgment was given for £5 and costs (including witnesses) £4 195. Merson v. Boyle. Claim £2 10s, balance for oats and corn sacks. Judgment for 5b and °osts7s^ Same v. McDevitt. Claim £33 ls lid for ploughing and chaff. Mr Henderjon for defendant. Judgment for £29 9s 6d and coßts 255. ;;.>-_. ... / -'/..:.)'/" Same y. Brroll. Claim. .£11, 13a. 6 .5d for chaff supplied, - . Jadgment for amount admitted by defendant, £10 10s, and costs 19s, Barnett v. Garthwaite. Olaim £1 l.i 3d* Judgment for claim and costs 7s, _—n«j—— —————— —————— ————_«
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ME18830130.2.14.1
Bibliographic details
Mataura Ensign, Volume V, Issue 225, 30 January 1883, Page 2
Word Count
456LUMSDEN. Mataura Ensign, Volume V, Issue 225, 30 January 1883, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.