SUPREME COURT.

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVIII, Issue 18413, 20 May 1920, Page 8

SUPREME COURT.

THE omr. LIST. * The civil sessions of the Supreme Court will be commenced at the conclusion of the criminal sessions, which Fill bo opened on Monday next. Ihe civil list is as follows: — (Jury of twelve.) Chamberlain v. Chamberlain, £7-13 for money lent, wages, etc. Clark v- Parker and another, £1250 damages for alleged misrepresentation. Penman v. Hornebush Brick and Coal Co., Ltd-, £2IXIO damages for death of husband Urcjuhart v Ashburton High School, £IOOO lor injuries. Cliisnall. v- Tinker, £1022 damages (motor collision;. ’ f -ibb and another v. Ear'shman, £521 damages through fire. iVyriehom and another v. Rnngitoto Estate Co'.. £IOOO. Day v. Taylor, £.501 for alleged slander. Lilly v- New Zealand Farmers’ Cooperative Assn., £1512 damages for injuries. Anderson v. Crump, £650 damages (collision between motor-cycle and gig). (Jury of four.) Howard v. Marsh, £3OO damages for injuries. Theimer v. Hopkins and another, claim against Hopkins for refund of £212 and interest; and against -No william, refund of £231 and interest. Louglinan v. Scott and another, specific, performance. Holmes v. Cook and Jnrdine, £340 11s Bd. Smith v. Hopkins, £250 and interest. Henderson and others v. Whyte and Whyte, £1(18 4sKiccarton Borough Council v. Canterbury College, £O6 3s 3d. rates. Bom! v. Clqvhnne, rescission of agreement and repayment of £1616. Kilpatrick v. Pearce, specific performance. Schroder v. Schroder, return of £265 and chattels. Rickerby v Blntchford, decree of partnership. Dowdall and Horweli v. Hopkins, repayment of £375, and for inquiries. Bishop v. Ford, £35 3s, moneys held for plaintiffs use.