Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CRIMINAL SESSIONS. Wednesday, February 10. (Before his Hou-or Mr Justice Denniston.) ALLEGED INDECENCY. The hearing of charges cf indecent behaviour against George Henry Barker was continued, when the accused, who was represented by Mr Donnelly, was charged with committing indecencies on September 24, at Hanmer Street and Fendalton Road, Fendalton ; on October 5, at Norman’s Road, St Albans; on November SO, at Jeffry’s Road, Fendalton; on November 30, at Idris Road, Fendalton; and on December 8, at Park Road, Fendalton. The accused pleaded not guilty. His Honor ordered tho Court to be cleared, and prohibited publication of evidence in the case. The jury, after a retirement of thir-ty-five minutes, returned a verdict of guilty. The accused, who was then brought up for sentence, gave his age as twen-ty-five. Mr Stringer said that nothing was known of the accused’s conduct prior to liis arrival in the dominion some months ago. There were forty complaints of offences of the kind just prior to the accused’s arrest, and there had been none since. His Honor said that apparently the best thing to do was to lcck the accused up for a lengthy period. Tho penalty was a year’s imprisonment for each offence, and the accused had been found guilty of many such offences. He believed that the prisoner was in a morbid state of mind almost approaching disease, but ho was a menace to society. A sentence of four months’ imprisonment on each of five charges wuld be inflicted, the sentences to be cumulative. The criminal sessions concluded at 5.50 p:m. [Per Press Association.] AUCKLAND. February 10. At the Supreme Court Arthur Myles, charged with breaking and entering at Mercer, was sentenced to ono year’s imprisonment. WELLINGTON, February 10. E. J. Searl, who had been found guilty of perjury, came up for sentence to-day. Counsel made a strong plea for probation, and Mr Justice Cooper remanded the caso until next day in order to consider the probation officer’s report.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19090211.2.12

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXX, Issue 14916, 11 February 1909, Page 5

Word Count
328

SUPREME COURT. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXX, Issue 14916, 11 February 1909, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXX, Issue 14916, 11 February 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert