THE DREYFUS CASE.
THE CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE. United Pres 3 Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright. PARIS, April 26.
The Court of Cassation declined to confront General Iloget with Colonel Picquart as requested by the Latter, whose evidence at the revisionary proceedings was contradictory to the statements of General Roget.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18990428.2.45
Bibliographic details
Lyttelton Times, Volume CI, Issue 11877, 28 April 1899, Page 5
Word Count
46THE DREYFUS CASE. Lyttelton Times, Volume CI, Issue 11877, 28 April 1899, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in